If you have an argument that is weak and uncogent, the conclusion may be either true or false.
An argument is a collection of two or more statements, one of which is supported by another. A conclusion is a proposition supported and a premise is a proposition supporting the conclusion. The purpose of an argument is to build a conclusion based on the premises or the evidence provided by the premises.
An inductive argument is one that claims that the conclusion follows with some degree of probability. In other words, premises make the conclusion more likely to be true, and premises true make the conclusion less likely to be false. Inductive arguments are powerful when given that the premises are true, the conclusion is unlikely to be false.
An inductive argument is weak when the conclusion is likely false given the premises are true. A strong argument is cogent if the premise is correct. A strong argument is uncogent if at least one of its premises is wrong.
Know more about uncogent argument here
brainly.com/question/13445406
#SPJ4
Answer:
The government agreed that it would be directed entirely by the great principles of Justice
Answer:
charismatic leader.
Explanation:
Charismatic leader -
These type of leaders motivates the people in order to perform well and improve , are known as charismatic leader.
These people are always full of energy and ready to help and guide the people to perform well and complete the task or activity on time.
Hence, from the question ,
Collette fits the description of charismatic leader.
Answer: A
Explanation:
In the late 1600 both France and Spain had control over it.
