1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
telo118 [61]
2 years ago
13

Why is the Constitution simple and brief?

History
1 answer:
KatRina [158]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Because that way every person can have an understanding of it. If it was written in a complicated way, most of the people in charge would have no idea how to do things according to the Constitution.

Explanation:

Hope this helped.

You might be interested in
Please help!! Will give brainliest answer!!!!!!!!!!
grin007 [14]
1. A
2. B
Puck magazine criticized the government many times.
6 0
3 years ago
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The Enlightenment would not have been possible without the scientific rev
Goryan [66]

<em>I agree.</em><em> </em><em>The scientific revolution brought light to some views and changed some beliefs humans had about how politics, life and many other topics. Until then a lot of natural phenomena were explained mainly by God hands, there was no much understanding of how things worked and humans could not interfere as much because they relied mostly on faith for changes in daily life, after the scientific revolution the humans during the Enlightenment started to take more responsibility for their healthy, nature disasters and the elections of their political representing, which before were believed to be indicated by God.</em>

5 0
3 years ago
Who controlled much of America's wealth during the 19th 20th centuries
Lyrx [107]
War ll george Washington
3 0
3 years ago
Free pay by those who wanted to exercise their right to vote
asambeis [7]

Answer:Voting is the core right of a democracy—the way in which the voice of each citizen finds its way into government. Efforts to keep someone from voting should therefore be of paramount concern. In the Jim Crow era, states enacted a number of laws to impede black people from voting, including residency and property restrictions, literacy tests, and poll taxes. The effort was enormously effective and only with the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was the use of these discriminatory restrictions banned.

It should be unfathomable to think that in 2020 we would still be fighting the same types of restrictions that impinged the right to vote during the Jim Crow era. But in several states, a form of poll tax persists, banning people who have failed to pay fines and fees from voting. The ABA has taken a stand against conditioning the right to vote on payment of fines and fees and, recently, efforts to abolish these discriminatory limitations on voting have gotten traction.

A (Ridiculously) Brief History of Voting Rights

The Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides, “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” According to the Constitutional Rights Foundation, when the amendment was ratified in 1870, more than 500,000 black men became voters (Race and Voting in the Segregated South). In Mississippi, “former slaves made up more than half of [the] state’s population.” During the next few elections, the impact of these voters was extraordinary. Mississippi elected the first two black U.S. senators: Hiram Rhodes Revels in 1870 and Blanche Bruce in 1875. A number of other black officials were elected throughout the state of Mississippi, including Alexander K. Davis, who served as lieutenant governor of Mississippi from 1871–76. Similar milestones were occurring throughout the South. In 1868, Louisiana elected Oscar Dunn, the first black lieutenant governor, and then, in 1872, Louisiana elected P.B.S. Pinchback, the first black governor.

This sudden and impactful progress gave way to an equally impactful backlash. Federal troops withdrew from the South in 1877, ending Reconstruction. Reactionary forces, including the Ku Klux Klan, became more active, and throughout the mid-1870s, political power in the South switched from Republicans to Democrats, who began passing laws to institute segregation and limit the voting power of black citizens.

In 1890, Mississippi held a state constitutional convention. The president of the convention declared its purpose plainly: “We came here to exclude the Negro” (Constitutional Rights Foundation, Race and Voting in the Segregated South). Because they could not ban black citizens from voting, they devised less direct restrictions that would have the same impact. One was the poll tax, which voters were required to pay for the two years prior to the election in which they sought to vote. Eventually, 11 southern states would impose a form of poll tax on residents. Another restriction was the literacy test, which required voters to read a section of the state constitution and explain it to the county clerk. The literacy test automatically excluded the approximately “60 percent of voting-age black men (most of them ex-slaves) who could not read.” (Id.)

These voter suppression efforts were incredibly effective. By 1890, the number of black voters registered in Mississippi fell below 9,000 or roughly 6 percent of voting-age black residents. (Kelly Phillips Erb, “For Election Day, A History of the Poll Tax in America,” Forbes, Nov. 5, 2018.) “In Louisiana, where more than 130,000 black voters had been registered in 1896, the number plummeted to 1,342 by 1904.” (Id.)

Despite their harmful impacts, courts largely upheld these restrictions. In Breedlove v. Suttles, 302 U.S. 277 (1937), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a Georgia poll tax stating, “payment of poll taxes as a perquisite of voting is not to deny any privilege or immunity protected by the Fourteenth Amendment . . . the state may condition suffrage as it deems appropriate.” Similarly, in Lassiter v. Northampton County Board of Elections, 360 U.S. 45 (1959), the Court held that because literacy tests were applied equally to all citizens regardless of race, they were not discriminatory.

It was not until the 1960s that these laws drew effective opposition. In 1964, the Twenty-Fourth Amendment was ratified, providing “The right of the citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election . . . shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.” Then, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 banned the use of literacy tests, established federal oversight of voter registration in key areas where minority voter registration was low, and authorized federal investigations into the use of poll taxes.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Why did so many Germans follow Hitler?
antoniya [11.8K]

2 words... Shlong-Dong

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Read the quote by Dolores Huerta.
    9·2 answers
  • How did the war affect women in both the North and South?
    13·1 answer
  • Which group was able to vote in the election of 1824 for the first time?
    9·1 answer
  • Do you think the United States would have gone to war with Spain without the explosion of the Maine? Why or why not?
    12·1 answer
  • The battle at bunker hill in 1775 was considered a victory for the continental army because
    15·2 answers
  • What are some of the reasons why roosevelt won the election of 1932?
    12·1 answer
  • I need this kinda urgently, please help? 50 Points!
    6·1 answer
  • Which amendment to the constitution gave women the right to vote? ​
    13·2 answers
  • How did China's economy<br> change under the Tang and<br> Song dynasties?
    10·1 answer
  • In a paragraph, describe at least three ways the Transcontinental Railroad affected
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!