Answer: Both will raise the same amount
Explanation:
The government here is certain that it can achieve the same quantity and price regardless of if it uses a pollution tax or pollution allowance. This means that it would be charging the companies the same regardless of the method used.
Both methods would therefore yield the same amount if the government uses either of them.
Answer:
pay a wage rate less than labor's MRP
Explanation:
A monopsonistic employer in an unorganized (nonunion) labor market will: "pay a wage rate less than labor's MRP"
The above statement is based on the idea that Monopsony is a market situation whereby a single buyer or firm is the only purchaser of a good or service, which in most cases has to do with the purchase of labor.
And given the fact that the firm is the sole purchaser of labor, where there is no labor union, there is a high tendency that such firm or employer pays a wage rate less than labor's marginal revenue productivity.
Answer:
Employment of low wage workers will decrease and which in turn increase the unemployment.
Explanation:
Perfectly competitive labor market, is the one which is described as the composite of many firms or companies that are in the competition for the workers. The firms will not be in power to set the wages for the workers, the market also determines the competitive wage.
But if this is a low wage labor and on that the government establish or form the minimum wage then it will result in the employment of the low wage workers will decrease and the consequence of which is increase in the unemployment.
Note: Options are missing so providing the direct answer
Answer:
b. She should develop herself as the EMV of developing is $1.125 million, which is higher than the EMV of selling.
Explanation:
The probability of discovered oil = 0.25 (25%)
Selling the exploration right= Selling Price + Probability of discovered oil × Royalty% × Future Profit
= $200,000 + 0.25 × 0.25 × $7,500,000 = $668,750
Developing = Probability of finding the oil × Future Profits - Cost of Well
= 0.25 × $7,500,000 - $750,000 = $1,125,000
= $1.125 million
Therefore the EMV for selling the exploration rights is less than the developing, the landowner will develop the site by his own.
Answer:
An increase in the price of one substitute good causes a decrease in supply for the other.
Explanation:
I just took a test on this subject last week :)
