Answer:
See explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
If 
then triangle PXY is isosceles triangle. Angles adjacent to the base XY of an isosceles triangle PXY are congruent, so
and
Angles 1 and 3 are supplementary, so
Angles 2 and 4 are supplementary, so
By substitution property,
Hence,
Consider triangles APX and BPY. In these triangles:
- given;
- given;- - proven,
so 
by ASA postulate.
Congruent triangles have congruent corresponding sides, then
Therefore, triangle APB is isosceles triangle (by definition).
F is proportional to 1/x^2
distance = x
A reduction of 25 percent = 0.75x
Let’s put this in place of x
F = 1/(0.75x)^2
And simplify
F = 1/0.5625x^2
So you need to find the percentage increase from 1/x^2 to 1/0.5625x^2
So what does 1/x^2 multiply by to give 1/0.5625x^2
Written as an equation it is y/x^2 = 1/0.5625x^2
Multiply both sides by x^2
y = 1/0.5625
y = 1.778 (rounded to 3 decimal points)
So the decimal multiplier is 1.778 and so the percent increase is approximately 77.8%
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
f(x)=2(x+4)(x-1)
=(2x+8)(x-1)
<h3>=2x²-2x+8x-8</h3>
=2x²+6x-8
Answer:
-14
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
a) Null and alternative hypothesis:
b) A Type I error is made when a true null hypothesis is rejected. In this case, it would mean a conclusion that the proportion is significantly bigger than 10%, when in fact it is not.
c) The consequences would be that they would be more optimistic than they should about the result of the investment, expecting a proportion of students that is bigger than the true population proportion.
d) A Type II error is made when a false null hypothesis is failed to be rejected. This would mean that, although the proportion is significantly bigger than 10%, there is no enough evidence and it is concluded erroneously that the proportion is not significantly bigger than 10%
e) The consequences would be that the investment may not be made, even when the results would have been more positive than expected from the conclusion of the hypothesis test.
Step-by-step explanation:
a) The hypothesis should be carried to test if the proportion of students that would eat there at least once a week is significantly higher than 10%.
Then, the alternative or spectulative hypothesis will state this claim: that the population proportion is significantly bigger than 10%.
On the contrary, the null hypothesis will state that this proportion is not significantly higher than 10%.
This can be written as:
