Answer:
Embargo Act (1807), U.S. President Thomas Jefferson's nonviolent resistance to British ... ships on the grounds that he was assisting Jefferson in enforcing the act. ... activity has been studied extensively, including the reasons for regulation and ... and the specific management problems that occur in the course of its lifetime.The logic behind the embargo was that cutting off all trade would so severely hurt the economies of Britain and France that the seizures at sea would end. Unfortunately, Jefferson miscalculated--the embargo harmed the American economy far more than the economies of Britain or France.President Thomas Jefferson hoped that the Embargo Act of 1807 would help the United States by demonstrating to Britain and France their dependence on American goods, convincing them to respect American neutrality and stop impressing American seamen. Instead, the act had a devastating effect on American trade
Explanation:
I'm Sorry, that's all i know about that event. But hope this helps:)
Gouverneur Morris of Pennsylvania and John Rutledge of South
Carolina were known to be supporter of strong central government. They believe
that states would be ineffective in governing when they are left alone. They
want the national government to have absolute control.
Well he's a really good author who writes percy jackson series along w a lot of other types of mythology that I like, its cool lol
Hopes this helps:
<span>It all comes down to separation and distribution of powers. If one person has all the power, then it is easy for that person to abuse that power. For example, if Congress had the power to pass laws and determine if these laws were constitutional, then by definition, all laws passed by Congress would be constitutional. Similarly, each Senator is a check on the power of the other Senators, such that no one Senator can pass legislation. The House is a check on the Senate and vice versa. Presumably, the Constitution is a check on everybody in government.</span>
