1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
solniwko [45]
3 years ago
8

What was true about strikes at the beginning of the labor movement?

History
2 answers:
Stells [14]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

C. The labor union strikes were dangerous.  

Masja [62]3 years ago
3 0

The labor union strikes were dangerous.

Explanation:

Due to the upheaval of industrial revolution many industries sprang up and laborers were exploited and oppressed by being paid less, they were also made to work in a very menacing environment and worked with some lethal machines which were life risking and fatal. Hence, to protect the interest of the workers were the unions formed. They mostly fought for the fair wages, better working conditions and less hours of work.

Great rail road’s strike is the major strike by the workers which spread throughout the country and the strikers tries to stop the trains run by the government. Army troops were sent to stop the strikers who obstructed the public service and this totally turned out to be a violent strike.

You might be interested in
Do you think that the United Nations can keep world peace? Why/Why not?
GarryVolchara [31]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

Because they can help each other to build our world. And in help of God

Can you mark me as Brainliest

Pleaassse!!

6 0
2 years ago
What are the two thought processes before and during President Thomas Jefferson buying Louisiana
Nikitich [7]
C I believe is the answer your looking for
4 0
3 years ago
Qhy does one party rule matter to totalitarian states
12345 [234]

The totalitarian states usually don't allow any opposition parties to exist. If some people try to form a party, they usually end up in prison, are banished from the nation, or even murdered.

The reason why the totalitarian rulers prefer a one party system is in order to have all the power in the country, without having opposition that will constantly go public about the terrors and injustices that are happening. If there are more parties, than the people will start to support them, especially cause rarely who likes to live under a totalitarian ruler, thus the totalitarian ruler will face a situation where he/she will lose its power.

3 0
3 years ago
The code of Hammurabi consisted of
alexandr1967 [171]
The Code of Hammurabi Consist of 282 Laws, In The Year 1750B.C. The Code of Hammurabi Was Inscribed on Stone. 
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why westward expansion create more conflict between the north and south
Eva8 [605]

In 1803, President Thomas Jefferson purchased the territory of Louisiana from the French government for $15 million. The Louisiana Purchase stretched from the Mississippi River to the Rocky Mountains and from Canada to New Orleans, and it doubled the size of the United States. To Jefferson, westward expansion was the key to the nation’s health: He believed that a republic depended on an independent, virtuous citizenry for its survival, and that independence and virtue went hand in hand with land ownership, especially the ownership of small farms. (“Those who labor in the earth,” he wrote, “are the chosen people of God.”) In order to provide enough land to sustain this ideal population of virtuous yeomen, the United States would have to continue to expand. The westward expansion of the United States is one of the defining themes of 19th-century American history, but it is not just the story of Jefferson’s expanding “empire of liberty.” On the contrary, as one historian writes, in the six decades after the Louisiana Purchase, westward expansion “very nearly destroy[ed] the republic.”

Manifest Destiny

By 1840, nearly 7 million Americans–40 percent of the nation’s population–lived in the trans-Appalachian West. Following a trail blazed by Lewis and Clark, most of these people had left their homes in the East in search of economic opportunity. Like Thomas Jefferson, many of these pioneers associated westward migration, land ownership and farming with freedom. In Europe, large numbers of factory workers formed a dependent and seemingly permanent working class; by contrast, in the United States, the western frontier offered the possibility of independence and upward mobility for all. In 1843, one thousand pioneers took to the Oregon Trail as part of the “Great Emigration.”

Did you know? In 1853, the Gadsden Purchase added about 30,000 square miles of Mexican territory to the United States and fixed the boundaries of the “lower 48” where they are today.

In 1845, a journalist named John O’Sullivan put a name to the idea that helped pull many pioneers toward the western frontier. Westward migration was an essential part of the republican project, he argued, and it was Americans’ “manifest destiny” to carry the “great experiment of liberty” to the edge of the continent: to “overspread and to possess the whole of the [land] which Providence has given us,” O’Sullivan wrote. The survival of American freedom depended on it.

Westward Expansion and Slavery

Meanwhile, the question of whether or not slavery would be allowed in the new western states shadowed every conversation about the frontier. In 1820, the Missouri Compromise had attempted to resolve this question: It had admitted Missouri to the union as a slave state and Maine as a free state, preserving the fragile balance in Congress. More important, it had stipulated that in the future, slavery would be prohibited north of the southern boundary of Missouri (the 36º30’ parallel) in the rest of the Louisiana Purchase.

However, the Missouri Compromise did not apply to new territories that were not part of the Louisiana Purchase, and so the issue of slavery continued to fester as the nation expanded. The Southern economy grew increasingly dependent on “King Cotton” and the system of forced labor that sustained it. Meanwhile, more and more Northerners came to believed that the expansion of slavery impinged upon their own liberty, both as citizens–the pro-slavery majority in Congress did not seem to represent their interests–and as yeoman farmers. They did not necessarily object to slavery itself, but they resented the way its expansion seemed to interfere with their own economic opportunity.

Westward Expansion and the Mexican War

Despite this sectional conflict, Americans kept on migrating West in the years after the Missouri Compromise was adopted. Thousands of people crossed the Rockies to the Oregon Territory, which belonged to Great Britain, and thousands more moved into the Mexican territories of California, New Mexico and Texas. In 1837, American settlers in Texas joined with their Tejano neighbors (Texans of Spanish origin) and won independence from Mexico. They petitioned to join the United States as a slave state.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the Two kinds of discrimination
    7·1 answer
  • Us government lesson 4
    9·1 answer
  • Which is NOT a characteristic of a “Unitary System”?
    7·1 answer
  • This is the power of the executive to prevent a bill from passing.
    14·1 answer
  • Benjamin Rush opposed the death penalty.<br> a. True <br> b. False
    5·1 answer
  • Why was the period after World War II described as the “Cold” War?
    6·2 answers
  • Creating the technology used to the atomic bomb,has only led to bad things for the United States and the World. True or False? E
    12·1 answer
  • What was one way that mathematics was used during the Renaissance?
    14·2 answers
  • Where was the Constitutional Convention held? Give the city AND the name of the building.
    6·1 answer
  • Why do terrorists attack?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!