1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Stolb23 [73]
3 years ago
13

1. a colonist who rebelled against England

History
1 answer:
inna [77]3 years ago
6 0

A Patriot

Patriots were those colonists of the Thirteen Colonies who rejected British rule during the American Revolution and declared the United States of America as an independent nation in July 1776.

You might be interested in
1. Who conquered Rome? and 2. What is one example of how bad life was in Rome when it was surrounded by the Visigoths?
Aliun [14]
<span>1.For the fall of Rome, it was the Huns invading from the east that caused the domino effect, they invaded (pushed into) the Goths, who then invaded (pushed into) the Roman Empire.

2. I'm not so sure</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is true about the Montgomery Bus Boycott?
Zanzabum

Answer:

A- rosa parks spent several months in jail after refusing to give up her seat

8 0
3 years ago
Did the Native Americans believe that acquiring possessions was an important goal?
ohaa [14]

Answer:

Explanation:At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.  

In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.

What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the result of Americans’ tradition of joining interest groups?
oee [108]

Answer:

a large number of interest groups of all sizes

Explanation:

Interest group tend to represent only one specific cause. Since the principles and moral standards that held by the citizens tend to be different from one another, the number of interest groups that created to cater to those standards also increased in size.

They tend to lobby for a particular type of government representatives who are willing to work to make laws that represent their principles/moral standards.

8 0
3 years ago
Compared to the time he spent in other parts of South America, Darwin spent little time collecting specimens in the Galapagos.
Katarina [22]

The answer is False.  Darwin spent a long period in the Galapagos Islands. He gathered specimens and jotted down his observations and made his analysis.  He was very meticulous in his research in that area.  It was one of the most important periods of Darwin’s life.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why was the constitution written to be vague and act as a guiding principle of government?
    14·1 answer
  • HELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLP
    15·2 answers
  • During the Golden Age of Athens, a tribute was
    9·2 answers
  • How do cities in the Coastal Plains<br> compare to other regions of Texas?
    15·1 answer
  • Solar energy and water are known as what? A. Perpetual resources B. Renewable resources C. Nonrenewable resources D. Fossil fuel
    8·1 answer
  • How are national powers and state powers the same?
    6·1 answer
  • Summary of what a sacrament is.​
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!
    5·1 answer
  • The human body contains trillions of cells. All cells in the human body are the same in structure and function.
    10·2 answers
  • HB Government (M) (Gequential) 2/04 Political Parties<br> 6. What is a political party
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!