Find the LCD (least common denominator)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb427/eb42710300b17990df3bfc77228fd80fe3e9156d" alt="\frac{5}{6} and \frac{1}{4}"
it would be 12 (6x2=12 and 4x3=12)
so you multiply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d23a/3d23acad34096a26600d9e1484dd20ccc5ccdfd6" alt="\frac{5}{6}"
by 2 and get
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9bc84/9bc84c482fcf07273b025a4140c8df1e1967fe14" alt="\frac{10}{12}"
then multiply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00c7a/00c7af90f06866ceef1a4da5365f48c00b893def" alt="\frac{1}{4}"
by 3 and get
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b60b/6b60bd39e585050a8814d8246be6bc6fc09d42e6" alt="\frac{3}{12}"
you get 3 WHOLE servings from
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d23a/3d23acad34096a26600d9e1484dd20ccc5ccdfd6" alt="\frac{5}{6}"
cups of icecream
Answer:
31 cm
Step-by-step explanation:
The area (A) of a trapezium is calculated as
A =
h (a + b)
where h is the height and a, b the bases
Here A = 162, h = 6 and a = 23 , then
× 6 (23 + b) = 162
3(23 + b) = 162 ( divide both sides by 3 )
23 + b = 54 ( subtract 23 from both sides )
b = 31
The other base is 31 cm
The number of chicken wings that Mohal can buy is 12.
<h3>How to calculate the cost?</h3>
It should be noted that Mohal bought 20 chicken wings for $50.00. The cost of each wing will be:
= Total amount / Number of chicken wings
= $50 / 20
= $2.50
When he spent $30.00, the number of wings will be:
= Amount / Cost per wing
= $30 / $2.50
= 12
There will be 12 chicken wings. This illustrates the proportion.
Learn more about cost on:
brainly.com/question/25109150
#SPJ1
Answer:
3) The function's leading coefficient is negative.
Explanation:
(1) Is not the answer because when x = 3, f(x) = 0.
(2) Is not the answer because when f(x) = -3,
x = 0.
(4) Is also not the answer because the y-values on both sides of (1, -4) are mirroring each other.
Therefore,
(3) is the answer, by elimination, but also because there is not proof of the leading coefficient being negative, as we don't see the original equation.
I hope this helped! :)
The correct answer is the first option