Answer:
B). The double blind procedure.
Explanation:
'The double blind procedure' is demonstrated as the procedure or method of experiment in which both the experimenter as well as the subjects or participants of the experiment are 'blind to' or 'unaware' of the crucial/significant aspects like hypothesis of the experiment
As per the question, the 'double blind procedure' is being employed by the investigators as neither the subject of the experiment nor the experimenter know about the 'experiment containing aspirin or mere placebos' which would help in producing the objective and unbiased deductions. Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
Please do not listen to these links and please do not click on them either I’m pretty sure they’re a scam and maybe what would help to get rid of them is to say at the end of all your questions don’t put any links or else I will be reporting stay safe!
Answer:
I will choose interview because I can ask my teacher the things which i don't know and can get more information about teacher life success and struggle as well
Answer:
B. extortion.
Explanation:
In the context of law, extortion is defined as a criminal offence where an offender/criminal obtains something, particularly money or property, through force or violent threats.
If we look into the above scenario, the two criminals have committed a series of offences, however, they did not force nor threat the client to invest his money into their scheme. Therefore, they cannot be charged with extortion by the court.
Instead they would be charged with criminal conspiracy for scheming a fraud, money laundering for transfering the money into their family business to conceal income and deceit for deceiving the man with lies.
