Answer: C) 4
==========================================================
Explanation:
Let's isolate t
-3 > -3t + 6
-3+3t > 6
3t > 6+3
3t > 9
t > 9/3
t > 3
This means any value can replace t such that it's larger than 3.
Something like t = 1/3 = 0.33 won't work since it's not larger than 3.
But something like t = 4 would work because it makes t > 3 true.
That's why choice C is the final answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
gradient(m)=change in y/change in x
=5-1/-9-(-4)
=4/-9+4
=4/-5
equation now
y-y1=m(x-x1)
y-1=4/-5[x-(-4)]
y=4/-5(x+4)+1
y=-4/5x-16/5+1
y=-4/5x-21/5
We know for our problem that Rachel makes $10 per hour. Since

represent the number of hours that she works,

will be the total amount that she will make for working

hours. We also know that she sells bracelets for $5 each. Since

represents the number of of bracelets that she sells,

will be her total revenue for selling

bracelets. We also know that she needs to earn at least $200 a week to cover her expenses, so the sum of

and

must be equal or greater than 200:

We can conclude that <span>the graphs that shows the inequality that represents this situation, with its solution region shaded is:</span>
Answer: It is not possible to find the vertex of the stated equation as it is in the form of f(x) = mx + b, a linear equation.
Step-by-step explanation:
Being in the form f(x) = mx + b, it is not possible to find a vertex due to the fact that there is none. This is because when an equation is written in the linear form it is representing a line not a parabola.
Given a parabola it is possible to find a vertex because in that case there is one.