by praising the efficiency of modern-day Internet research doesn't relate to anything regarding "Choreographers of Matter, Life, and Intelligence" when it comes to argumentation. Comparing scientific knowledge to grains of sand on a beach is poetic, but it is no argument either. Proving names of modern scientists and their contributions also shows nothing but the scientists and their contributions themselves. It doesn't work as proof for <em>"an impending scientific revolution".</em>
What Michio Kaku does, as the good scientist that he is, is to show evidence. And he does so "by providing quantitative proof of recent scientific progress"
Please someone help me with this too!!!!
Answer:
This school year was difficult for most of us. It was harder to learn online instead of being able to learn in a classroom. Having to learn everything through watching videos instead of being able to learn in person was difficult because when we learned in person, we would be forced to pay attention and actually do work so we actually learned things. This year was just us trying to submit work before the deadline not even comprehending what we learned.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Glosary of Reading Terms
Explanation:
The study of reading is a science with roots in many domains; linguists study reading, psychologists study reading, educators study reading, even computer scientists are studying reading. The process of reading has been dissected and examined from a variety of perspectives, and experts in the field have had to adapt and modify terminology or generate new terminology to describe what their examinations have revealed.
Cited Sources:
https://sedl.org/reading/framework/glossary.html
The best way to punctuate the sentence is: "We enjoyed perfect skiing weather," my friends told me. "The sun came out and the wind died down completely."
