1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vladimir1956 [14]
3 years ago
13

State two rights of women and children in relationships​

Law
1 answer:
Artyom0805 [142]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Rights of women are:

Safe motherhood.

Equal participation in politics and work.

Rights of children are:

Right for food, shelter, education etc.

Right of entertainment.

You might be interested in
Which is the most important speech given at the national convention?​
Vesna [10]

Answer:

Keynote address

Explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
HURRY PLS
Sonbull [250]

Answer:

Government And Business in Voice for Reason

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
OJ Simpson's "Dream Team" of lawyers and
lapo4ka [179]

Answer:

On June 12, 1994, Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman, were found dead at Brown's home. Prosecutors argued that Simpson killed his ex-wife and her lover out of jealousy. Prosecutors began by reporting Nicole Brown Simpson's call to the emergency center from 1989. In it, Nicole Brown said she was afraid Simpson would harm her. Prosecutors also came up with Simpson's DNA material and shoe prints from him, found at the scene of the crime. Dozens of experts stated that Simpson must have been at the scene of the crime. There was a lot of circumstantial scientific evidence.

Simpson hired a team of expensive attorneys led by Robert Shapiro and later Johnnie Cochran. Cochran was nationally known as a lawyer for (mainly black) celebrities and specialized in cases involving discrimination or police brutality. From the outset, the defense was based on the charge of racism. The lawyers claimed that Simpson had been a victim of police fraud by depositing evidence against Simpson at the crime scene. The leader of the investigation into the double murder (Mark Fuhrman) was called a racist by the defense, and the lawyers found footage in which Fuhrman had used the N word.

While prosecutors believed they had a solid case and expected a conviction, polls showed that a majority of black residents of the United States believed that Simpson had been a victim of police fraud. Most white residents of the United States were convinced of Simpson's guilt. As the jury's verdict drew closer, racial tension rose, and some politicians feared a repeat of the Los Angeles race riots a few years earlier. On October 3, 1995 Simpson was acquitted of murder by the jury.

6 0
3 years ago
Explain the Congregate System, the Contract Labor System and the Anti Contract Law of 1887. Who was corrupt and how was it corre
horrorfan [7]

The Congregate System was a method used in the 19th century in which prisoners were used to produce goods that were then sold. This was the first instance of such type of slave labor, which has been used in several instances since them. Under this system, prisoners worked in silence during the day, and were held in solitary confinement at night.

On the other hand, the Contract Labor System was a system used during the same time period in order to attract immigrants to work in the United States. This system created contracts with below-market wages in order to bring primarily Chinese immigrants to the country.

Both of these systems employed people while paying them much less than the value of their work (or, in the case of prisoners, nothing). They were ways in which cheap labor was abused for the benefits of a few wealthy people.

The Alien Contract Law was passed in order to curb these abuses. The legislation prohibited employers from recruiting and importing laborers from abroad with promises of work. The main purpose was to decrease the number of Chinese immigrants in the United States. It also tried to regulate the differences in payment between immigrants and Americans.

3 0
4 years ago
A federal statute prohibits discrimination based on age for all persons between the ages of 50 and 70 in matters relating to emp
finlep [7]

Answer:

A Federal Statute and a State Constitutional Provision

The judge is likely to prevail in this case.

Explanation:

In any matter where the federal statute prohibiting age discrimination conflicts with a state constitutional provision, the U.S. Constitution or the federal statute will prevail.  This means that based on this conflict, the state constitutional provision will be declared unconstitutional and unenforceable.  The reason is that federal statutes or the U.S. Constitution takes priority over all other laws.  Therefore, the judge will prevail in the lawsuit and prevent the state governor from replacing him.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The core constitutional principle defining the role of the legislature and the
    14·1 answer
  • Identify a problem for which we need a law.Explain you're answer
    5·1 answer
  • A high school principal has reason to suspect some students of bringing weapons on to campus. After receiving a tip from a teach
    12·2 answers
  • 7. If during the last 100 feet of approaching a railroad crossing, you cannot see the track for at least 400 feet in both direct
    6·1 answer
  • Structured fines are presumed to be fairer than tariff fines because tariff fines are
    9·2 answers
  • Sublinha a sílaba tônica de cada palavra abaixo e acentue Também ninguém armazéms alguém parabéns além refém Vintém
    11·1 answer
  • As described by the institutional anomie theory, what does American Dream imply? A. It implies that every individual should atta
    9·2 answers
  • Which is a true statement about James McCulloch of McCulloch v. Maryland?
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELPPP , IM SO LOST THE QUESTIONS ARE ABOVE . ANYTHING HELPS
    15·2 answers
  • What is the most important thing a person should do to avoid debt?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!