Answer:
"Evidence that is formally presented before the trier of fact (i.e., the judge or jury) to consider in deciding the case. The trial court judge determines whether or not the evidence may be proffered. To be admissible in court, the evidence must be relevant (i.e., material and having probative value) and not outweighed by countervailing considerations (e.g., the evidence is unfairly prejudicial, confusing, a waste of time, privileged, or based on hearsay). Also termed competent evidence; proper evidence; legal evidence."
Explanation:
Answer: The wealthy elites
Explanation:
The framers of the US Constitution created the United States Senate to protect the rights of each states and safeguard minority opinions in a system of government designed to give greater power to the national government. They modeled the Senate on governors' councils of the colonial era and on the state senates. The constitution framers intended that the Senate would be an independent body of responsible citizens who would share power with the president and the House of Representatives.
Answer:
in both cases the flyer was presented to the barber before the service was provided.
a) no, because Karl was informed about the mistake and the real price and could then still have decided to take his business elsewhere. but if he then agreed to still have the service performed under the now updated conditions, then that is what the "contract" is basing on.
he has no grounds to claim the other price afterwards.
b) no, because the service provider saw the flyer information, did not object to or correct the information right away, but performed the service instead. now the "contract" is based on that agreement based on the conditions of the flyer.
Because each year it goes through the same cycle of seasons
spring,summer,fall,winter,repeat
hope this helped
