Based on the marginal cost and the marginal revenue to this monopolistically competitive firm, in the short run the firm should increase the level of output.
<h3>Why should the firm increase output?</h3>
Firms will maximize their profit if they produce at a point where marginal cost equals marginal revenue.
As the marginal revenue is $25 and the marginal cost is $20, the firm should increase output until both these things are the same.
Find out more on maximizing profit at brainly.com/question/13799721.
#SPJ1
Answer: Hello below is the complete question
A survey of entrepreneurs focused on their job characteristics, work habits, social activities, leisure time, etc. One question put to each entrepreneur was, "What make of car (U.S., Europe, or Japan) do you drive?" The responses (number in each category) for a sample of 100 entrepreneurs are summarized below. The goal of the analysis is to determine if the proportions of entrepreneurs who drive American, European, and Japanese cars differ.
U.S. Europe Japan
40 35 25
In order to determine whether the true proportions in each response category differ, a one-way chi-square analysis should be conducted. Suppose the p-value for the test was calculated to be p=0.1738 . What is the appropriate conclusion to make when testing at α = 0.10?
Answer : The conclusion to be drawn is that We cannot reject the Null hypothesis if we use a one-way chi square analysis because at α = 0.1 from the chi-square tabulated p-value = 0.584 while the calculated /given p-value is = 0.1738
Explanation:
Data given:
p-value = 0.1738
α = 0.10
sample size = 100
U.S cars = 40, Europe cars = 35, Japan cars = 25
The conclusion to be drawn is that We cannot reject the Null hypothesis if we use a one-way chi square analysis because at α = 0.1 from the chi-square tabulated p-value = 0.584 while the calculated /given p-value is = 0.1738
Answer:
MR = 10 – 1q1.
Explanation:
Demand function, P = 20 – 0.5Q
Q = q1 + q2
Now insert Q in the P = 20 – 0.5Q.
P = 20 – 0.5 (q1 + q2)
We have the value of q2 = 20.
P = 20 – 0.5 (q1 + q2)
P = 20 – 0.5 (q1 + 20)
P = 20 – 0.5q1 – 10
P = 10 – 0.5q1
Total revenue of firm 1, TR = Pq1
TR = 10q1 – (0.5q1)^2
Now MR is the differentiation of TR. So the MR after differentiation if TR of firm 1 is:
MR = 10 – 1q1
Answer:
See explanation below for answer.
Explanation:
The manager should embark on an investigation, in order to get to the bottom of the matter. The accusation must be treated seriously in order to make sure that the root cause of the problem is established, this will be done with the details of the harassment that the employee provides.
Also, the witnesses that the employee has mentioned must be questioned in order to establish the facts of the issue. The matter must be treated with the utmost urgency, in order to stop the issue from repeating itself, because this will affect the productivity of the affected employees if left unchecked.
The best term to the situation where Greg is in is that he is an expatriate. It is a term called to a person who resides or is living outside his country. This explains the situation where Greg is in Saudi Arabia when he originally from Florida. This is also a term that describes to a person who is living abroad.
