Answer:
A, B and D
Explanation:
Expanding the money supply is an exercise of expansionary monetary policy.
This decision will first allow our tech startup to acquire cheaper loans and expand our operations, this expansion in operations will result in new employment opportunities and hence as a result, unemployment will be reduced assuming this is a general trend in the economy.
This decision also directly reflects an increased investment and hence the GDP on the whole and the investment part of GDP would both increase,
GDP = C + I + G + (X - M), where I = investment.
This change in macro economy will increase aggregate demand due to expansionary effects. Increase in imports is not conclusive as it may or may not happen depending upon the demand state.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
The answer is: $2,700
Explanation:
The house sold for $180,000 (= 90% x $200,000).
The total commission was $9,000 (= $180,000 x 5%), split in half between listing office and selling office.
The selling broker received his $4,500 commission, and then h paid his selling associate 60% of it.
The selling associate received a $2,700 commission (= 60% x $4,500)
Answer:
This means that Kimberlei's GDP is <em><u> less sensitive than </u></em> Clarkistan's GDP to fluctuations in the components of total spending.
Clarkistan's economy is <em><u>more </u></em>sensitive to fluctuations in GDP than Kimberlei's economy. This is because the personal income tax has <em><u> reduced </u></em> Kimerlei's multiplier.
Explanation:
As Kimberlei multiplier is lower, the government spending fluctuation will have a lower impact than in Clarkistan as the goverment spending multiplier in the latter is higher thus, a fluctuation increases or decrease the GDP in a higher proportion.
Clarkistan Economy is more sensitive as their government has a higher multiplier when it decreases for recessions it will increase by a higher amount
while Kimberlei as the income tax decreases th effect of the multiplier It is lower. thus the change in GDP is also lower
Answer:
Alma would have $ 4,269.61 for her trip in four years' time
Explanation:
The amount she would have for her trip in four years' time can be computed using the future value formula which is given as:
FV=PV*(1+r/t)^N*t
PV is the amount she has today which is $3,500
r is the rate of return the credit union offered her,that 5%
t is the number of times in a year the interest is compounded which is 4
N is the number of years the investment would last which is 4 years
FV=$3,500*(1+5%/4)^4*4
FV=$3,500*(1+1.25%)^16
FV=$3,500*(1.0125)^16
FV=$3,500*1.219889548
FV=$4,269.61
Alma would have $ 4,269.61 for her trip in four years if the $3,500 is invested at 5% compounded quarterly
Answer:
Implement the selected alternatives
Explanation:
The decision making process is divided in 4 rational steps:
1. Identify the existing problem: know what is the difficulty that is being presented, it involves all what is being affected.
2. List possible solutions for the existing problem: here the person lookfl for all the possible ways to solve a problem and the different variables that are being affected.
3. evaluate and select the most beneficial alternative: in this step the person foresee the results of each alternative and choose the once that would work in the best way.
4. Implement the alternative that was selected: it implies the work of every person involved in the results, follow the plan and the improvement of the initial problem.
Sometimes it is added a 5th step, the feedback and evaluation of the implemented alternative to know if the problem was fully solved.
