1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
notsponge [240]
2 years ago
7

What were the consequences of European imperialism in South Africa ??

History
2 answers:
nikitadnepr [17]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

There were several negatives of colonialism for the Africans like resource depletion, labor exploitation, unfair taxation, lack of industrialization, dependence on cash crop economy, prohibition of trade, the breaking up of traditional African society and values, lack of political development, and ethnic rivals inside ...

nydimaria [60]2 years ago
4 0

Answer: British desire for natural resources, slave labors and political dominance brought about long-term effects to South Africa, the negative effects include widespread racial discrimination and economic exploitation, but there were few positive effects which were the advances in agriculture, mining industry and education.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
David livingstone believed that opening the interior of africa to christianity and trade would question 2 options: spark revolts
vladimir2022 [97]
<span>end the slave trade
</span>

while slave trade had been declared illegal in the European countries and in the USA following the civil war, in parts of Africa,especially along the East Africa coast, Arabs trader were adamant of ending slavery, and the sultan seyyid Said would hear none of it. Livingstone suggested that Christianity was the only way to deal with this menace. and on his first stop in east african coast, he helped secure a number of slaves who were settled at Rabai.
<span /><span />
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe what happened at the “Rap of Nanjing” and give me your thoughts on the US response. How much did we know and would you
Ostrovityanka [42]

Following a bloody victory in Shanghai during the Sino-Japanese War, the Japanese turned their attention towards Nanking. Fearful of losing them in battle, Nationalist leader Chiang Kai-Shek ordered the removal of nearly all official Chinese troops from the city, leaving it defended by untrained auxiliary troops. Chiang also ordered the city held at any cost, and forbade the official evacuation of its citizens. Many ignored this order and fled, but the rest were left to the mercy of the approaching enemy.

Did you know? Once one of China's most prosperous cities and industrial centers, Nanking took decades to recover from the devastation it experienced. Abandoned as the national capital in 1949 for Beijing, it grew into a modern industrial city during the communist period and today is home to many of China's largest state-owned firms.

A small group of Western businessmen and missionaries, the International Committee for the Nanking Safety Zone, attempted to set up a neutral area of the city that would provide refuge for Nanking’s citizens. The safety zone, opened in November 1937, was roughly the size of New York’s Central Park and consisted of more than a dozen small refugee camps. On December 1, the Chinese government abandoned Nanking, leaving the International Committee in charge. All remaining citizens were ordered into the safety zone for their protection.

Arrival of the Troops

On December 13, the first troops of Japan’s Central China Front Army, commanded by General Matsui Iwane, entered the city. Even before their arrival, word had begun spreading of the numerous atrocities they had committed on their way through China, including killing contests and pillaging. Chinese soldiers were hunted down and killed by the thousands, and left in mass graves. Entire families were massacred, and even the elderly and infants were targeted for execution, while tens of thousands of women were raped. Bodies littered the streets for months after the attack. Determined to destroy the city, the Japanese looted and burned at least one-third of Nanking’s buildings.

Though the Japanese initially agreed to respect the Nanking Safety Zone, ultimately not even these refugees were safe from the vicious attacks. In January 1938, the Japanese declared that order had been restored in the city, and dismantled the safety zone; killings continued until the first week of February. A puppet government was installed, which would rule Nanking until the end of World War II.

Aftermath of the Massacre

There are no official numbers for the death toll in the Nanking Massacre, though estimates range from 200,000 to 300,000 people. Soon after the end of the war, Matsui and his lieutenant Tani Hisao, were tried and convicted for war crimes by the International Military Tribunal for the Far East and were executed. Anger over the events at Nanking continues to color Sino-Japanese relations to this day. The true nature of the massacre has been disputed and exploited for propaganda purposes by historical revisionists, apologists and Japanese nationalists. Some claim the numbers of deaths have been inflated, while others have denied that any massacre occurred.

4 0
3 years ago
Which side do you think you agree with more and why? Either the left (democrat), the right (republican), or the middle (moderate
o-na [289]

Answer:      I agree with the right side(republicans) because they are more conservative.  The gas prices begin to lower, prices like food, clothes, etc. are lower, Health care is easier to find, and Jobs are easier to find plus viruses don't get spread around as much.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
The items listed above represent cultural contributions of which group?
Rashid [163]

D. African slaves in the American colonies


4 0
3 years ago
Choose two landmark Supreme Court decisions and write a paragraph about each. In each paragraph, analyze whether the Court’s dec
ziro4ka [17]

Answer:

Birth control and abortion Roe v. Wade it does reflect the spirit of the constitution. It reflects  because it protects a pregnant woman's liberty to choose to have an abortion without excessive government restriction. And this shows how individual rights come into play when talking about landmark decisions. The second is discrimination against race. Race is one of the biggest things in today's society and when talking about this topic its a hard decision. First it goes together with the constitution for many reasons individual rights. And during this meeting of Dred Scott v. Sanford they discussed Black African Americans rights to become a citizen which means the rights of the Constitution were not even considered.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What type of force are you exerting when you lie on a bed
    6·1 answer
  • Which freedom was most important to the british settalers who origanally settles pennsylvania
    11·2 answers
  • What major event happened in the United States on September 11, 2001?
    8·2 answers
  • What was New England’s economy like?
    9·1 answer
  • Aabout 3100 B.C., Upper and Lower Egypt united to become one kingdom and credit for this goes to Narmer, who was also known as:
    15·1 answer
  • During world war i, buying war bonds was a way for people to
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a result from the Potsdam Conference?
    12·1 answer
  • How did nixon propose to end the vietnam war?
    10·1 answer
  • List the major parts or aspects of Humanism
    14·1 answer
  • The religious beliefs of these early African peoples was based on what type of ideology?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!