<span>Experiences with the British monarchy made them worry that the government would have too much power but they created a weak government under the Articles of Confederation.
The experiences with the British showed us how a government would be transformed into a tyranny if it left unchecked/unregulated.
But since at that time we're too paranoid about this, we instead create a government that basically couldn't operate since ther are too much limitation the congress.</span>
Answer:
Many Social Darwinists embraced laissez-faire capitalism and racism. They believed that government should not interfere in the “survival of the fittest” by helping the poor, and promoted the idea that some races are biologically superior to others.
Social Darwinists believe in “survival of the fittest”—the idea that certain people become powerful in society because they are innately better. Social Darwinism has been used to justify imperialism, racism, eugenics and social inequality at various times over the past century and a half.
In the late 1800s, many Americans enthusiastically embraced Spencer's "Social Darwinism" to justify laissez-faire, or unrestricted, capitalism. In 1859, Charles Darwin published Origin of Species, which explained his theory of animal and plant evolution based on "natural selection."
<span>This is a true statement. Information systems assist people who are at an impasse regarding decision making because they can aggregate data and give a clear picture of what the next step should be. These systems also also people to store this data in case the decisions are required at a later date.</span>
