The federal government would've lost all control and the United States probably would've broken up because they all would have their own opinions and thought they could do it on their own with no help from the other states.
This is the most common system in nations that allow more than one political
party. Coalitions often break down when disputes arise. The answer is yes because most often there are chosen multiparty systems because because one party system usually don't get enough votes. As i sed before on multiparty systems there are disputes and this makes multiparty systems unstable.
Hope i helped. Peace ✌️
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "A. Warren believed the Court had to consider the public interest as well as the intent of the Framers of the Constitution." This is the <span>statement that describes Earl Warren's judicial philosophy.</span>
Answer:
d) in a republic, elected individuals, rather than citizens themselves, have the direct power to make most governmental decisions
Explanation:
In a republic state, the power is held by the people and their elected representatives, who choose a president instead of a monarch. On the other hand, a democracy is a system formed by the whole population, who usually chooses their representatives. As a result, the direct power in a republic is held by the people's representatives in the Congress, while power in a democracy is typically held by the population itself.
Trader, dealer, trafficker, wholesaler, agent, buyer
