A.the first graph all the way to the left, hope this helped :P
Answer:
<u>The effect of government regulation on a monopolist's production decisions</u>
Explanation:
The effect of a large government budget deficit on the economy's price level
The superavit or deficit of the government is a macroeconomics subject.
The money market is also macroeconomics.
The impact of regulation or specifit taxes or tax extemption on a monopolist's production will be part of microecnomics, because it will impact on which level the monopolist's production finds equilibrium after the legislation.
Answer:
given statement is false
Explanation:
given data
rent expense = $24,000
operating departments, A = 10,000 square feet
operating departments, B = 20,000 square feet
operating departments, C = 30,000 square feet
cost allocation rate = $0.80 per square foot
solution
rent expense will be here as
rent expense = 
rent expense = $0.40 per square foot
and
rent expense allocated to department C is = 30000 × $0.40
rent expense allocated to department C = $12000
so given statement is false
Answer:
The answer is "that, the transferee is also an instrument holder only in the precise way".
Explanation:
In the given question the correct choice was missing. so, the correct choice can be defined as follows:
This is a signed contract guaranteeing a monthly payment to just the individual or consumer in question like, Inspections, money orders, and promissory notes are typical examples of negotiable instruments, in which its holder is the instrument only for the transferor, and the wrong choice can be defined as follows:
- In choice a, it is incorrect because not all signatures were authentic.
- In choice b, it is incorrect because the issuer is solvent as far as she does not know.
- In choice c, it is wrong because the system was changed.
