All categories

3 years ago

If the us wants to help the economy should it print more money? Why or not.

1 answer:

vladimir1956 [14]3 years ago

8 0

Yes because by this point in time money means power. If you're a homeless person on the street what power do you have? You can even sleep in the same spot for 2 days. Economy means money and if you want a better economy then you need to print out more cash. Although paper can damage trees and cause problems, this is the only way to stabilize the economy. When the economy is balanced then the US can stop printing money and start replaced the tress that were used to create the paper.

Hope this helped :)

You might be interested in

In a criminal tax case, Darth Vader was charged with several counts of tax evasion and filing a false income tax return, stemmin

Vitek1552 [10]

Answer:

<em>Darth's response is not adequate as he has systemically illegitimately manipulated the Jedi's assets to evade taxes. Therefore all those funds in question will be taken into account when measuring Jedi's taxable income. </em>

It can be inferred after that that that the Jedi has some existing gain / retained earnings or not.

<em>When Darth considers himself guilty, he shall be liable for charges of fine, reward and prosecution under sec.7201.</em>

7 0

3 years ago

Which principle dictates that managers should receive a raise in pay based upon their contributions to the organization, and not

JulsSmile [24]

A <u>Distributive justice</u> is the principle that dictates that managers should receive a raise in pay based upon their contributions to the organization, and not based on their gender.

<h3>What is the Distributive justice?</h3>

It is a principle that is mainly concerned with the fair allocation of resources among the diverse members of a community; the fair allocation takes into account the total amount of goods to be distributed, distributing procedure and the pattern of distribution that results as well.

In an organization setting, the principle occurs when all employees believe that outcomes are equitable, that is, the outcomes are either tangible such as pay or intangible such as positive feedback.

Read more about Distributive justice

brainly.com/question/14837089

#SPJ1

5 0

1 year ago

Consider Derek's budget information: materials to be used totals $65,100; direct labor totals $198,700; factory overhead totals

egoroff_w [7]

Answer:

cost of goods manufactured= $653,500

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Consider Derek's budget information: materials to be used totals $65,100; direct labor totals $198,700; factory overhead totals $393,700; work in process inventory January 1, $188,500; and work in progress inventory on December 31, $192,500.

cost of goods manufactured= beginning WIP + direct materials + direct labor + allocated manufacturing overhead - Ending WIP

cost of goods manufactured= 188,500 + 65,100 + 198,700 + 393,700 - 192,500= $653,500

5 0

3 years ago

Athens Delivery Service is hired on October 31, 2018 to perform services, beginning on November 1, 2018. The delivery services w

solmaris [256]

Answer: $6600 Explanation: Athens' entered into a contract to deliver services from November 1. This contract is valid for 6 months. Their fiscal year ends on December 31. This means that only 2 months worth of services will be delivered in 2018. Even if Athens received cash for the full 6 months they can only record the revenue when they have fulfilled the obligations and rendered the service. Because only 2 months were rendered in 2018, they can only record $6600 ($3300 × 2 months) in the 2018 fiscal year. The outstanding 4 months' balance will remain in income received in advance account until these 4 months' services are actually rendered and the obligation is fulfilled by Athens.

7 0

3 years ago

The Investments Fund sells Class A shares with a front-end load of 5% and Class B shares with 12b-1 fees of 0.75% annually as we

elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

Answer:

The responses to the given choices can be defined as follows:

Explanation:

Assume is the investment. Each original Class A investment is of the net-front unburden. The portfolio will be worth four years from now:

$\$1,000 \times 5\% = \$50 =\$1,000 - \$50 = \$950\\\\ \$950 (1 + 0.13)^4 = \$950 (1.13)^4 = \$950 (1.630474) = \$1,548.95\\\\$

You will place the total of $\$1,000$ on class B shares, but only $12b-1$ will be paid $(13-0.75 = 12.25)$ at a rate of $12.25\%$ and you'll pay a $1\%$ back-end load charge if you sell for a four-year period.

After 4 years, your portfolio worth would be:

$\$1,000 (1 + 0.1225)^4 = \$1,437.66 \\\\ \$1,000 (1.1225)^4 = \$1000 (1.587616) = \$ 1,587.62$

Their portfolio worth would be: after charging the backend load fee:

$\$1,587.616 \times 0.99 = \$1,571.74 \\\\ Amounts \\\\ Class A \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1,548.95\\\\ Class B \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1,571.74 \\\\$

When the horizon is four years, class B shares are also the best option.

Class A shares would value from a 12-year time frame:

$\$950 (1.13)^{12} = \$950 (4.334523) = \$4,117.80 \\\\$

In this case, no back-end load is required for Class B securities as the horizon is larger than 5 years.

Its value of the class B shares, therefore, is as follows:

$\$1,000 (1.1225) 12 = \$1,000 (4.001623) = \$4,001.62 \\\\Amounts \\\\\ Class A \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 4,117.80\\\\ Class B \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 4,001.62\\\\$

Class B shares aren't any longer a valid option in this, prolonged duration. Its impact on class B fees of $0.75\%\ \ 12b-1$ cumulates over a period and eventually outweighs the $5\%$ the burden of class A shareholders.

4 0

3 years ago