Answer:
do not Install guard rail because the guard rail cost exceed the expected benefits
Explanation:
given data
guard rail cost = $70,000
average damage = $10,000
guard rail prevent = 5 vehicles
to find out
What should the county do
solution
we know here guard rail cost is $70,000
but expected benefits = $10,000 × 5
expected benefits = $50,000
so we can say that do not Install guard rail because the guard rail cost exceed the expected benefits
Answer:
350,000
And if done per unit, $3.50
Explanation:
Both sales and variable cost are dependent on the number of units sold.
The sales less the variable cost gives the contribution margin. The contribution margin less the fixed cost gives the net operating income.
The target cost of the product is the difference between the selling price and the anticipated profit.
Target cost per unit
= $6.00 - $2.50
= $3.50
Total Target cost = $3.50 * 100,000
= $350,000
Answer:
Bond Price = $97.4457408 million rounded off to $97.45 million
Explanation:
To calculate the price of the bond today, we will use the formula for the price of the bond. We assume that the interest rate provided is stated in annual terms. As the bond is an annual bond, the coupon payment, number of periods and annual YTM will be,
Coupon Payment (C) = 113 million * 0.05 = 5.65 million
Total periods (n) = 30
r or YTM = 0.06 or 6%
The formula to calculate the price of the bonds today is attached.
Bond Price =5.65 * [( 1 - (1+0.06)^-30) / 0.06] + 113 / (1+0.06)^30
Bond Price = $97.4457408 million rounded off to $97.45 million
Answer:
Normal goods
Explanation:
In simple words, normal goods refers to the goods which re necessary for the survival for the survival for re consumer and the consumer do not take its quality into consideration while making a purchase decision.
The demand for such goods have a positive relationship with the income of consumer, that is, when the income or wages of consumer increase the demand for such goods also increases and vice versa.
The increase in demand for normal goods by consumer is sometimes also seen as an indicator of an economic growth. Clothes, vegetable and medicines are some of the many examples of normal goods.
Answer:
The answer is NO.
Explanation:
The answer is NO since the tax cut does not equate or rather would not be an effective stimulus due to the fact that debt reduction would not stimulate or increase consumption.
To properly understand the narrative of the question and the answer herein, let us define what effective stimulus is.
Effective stimulus or as preferably known as An economic stimulus is the utilization of funds or design of that helps agitate growth during downtime or recession in a country. The decision makers of a country mostly utilize the tactics of giving rebates and increasing government expenses to name a few.
Now relating it back to the question, since the intention of the rebate is to ease payment on tax does not equate to increase in consumption, the answer is a NO.