1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kirill [66]
3 years ago
6

I need help with number 3.

History
1 answer:
allochka39001 [22]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

No

Explanation:

I just did this

You might be interested in
how would you define the term "massacre"? How many people have to die in order for an event to be called a "massacre".
SpyIntel [72]

Answer:

Explanation:

Massacre: an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of people.

“an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of many people” Many is of course “A large quantity”. So there we have it, certainly more than a couple but if it gets to be say 100,000, which is definitely a large number, I suspect that might be encroaching into the realms of genocide.

OK so if you happen upon a car crash and there are bodies spread over the scene, 2 from each of the 2 cars, then you would immediately spot, just by looking there were 4 people involved, but if it was a pair of coaches each with 52 passengers and they were all spread around the scene you wouldn’t be able to put a number to it by just sweeping your eyes across the mess, perhaps then it is getting to be a massacre. Could that be a useful definition? If the number slaughtered is more than you can estimate merely with a look? I also think it needs to be within a definable area, like a football field, or a stadium or perhaps a town. If it involved a whole region of a country then it becomes Genocide, maybe.

Could it be then The indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of more people within a definable area than you can estimate readily with a sweep of your eyes.

Just a suggestion, so go gently on me ………….

6 0
3 years ago
In the years following the Civil War, many people moved to large cities in the North. Which factor would have been
12345 [234]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

i took the test

7 0
3 years ago
ILL MARK BRAINLEISST PLEASE HELP FAST (POST TEST)
Damm [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

the answer is b

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was one reason that Patriots were more willing to go to war with Britain than the Loyalists? (5 points)
ozzi

Answer:

d ) Patriots were more likely than Loyalists to believe in the idea of consent of the governed.

Explanation:

The first thing you would understand is that Loyalists were called Loyalists because they supported the rules of Great Britain. If they supported staying as a colony, why would they have any will in the first place to "go to war" with Great Britain if they are contend with the status they hold during the time? The only group that wanted to go to war was the Patriot group, not the Loyalist group.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question 9 of 10
dexar [7]
<h3>Answer:</h3>

D. Because the Sudanese government focused on rebels in general,

not a specific ethnic group.

<h3>Explanation:</h3>

Since the early 2000s, violence against the Sudanese government has been prevalent in the Darfur region. Although, it was not defined as genocide by the UN.

Genocide

First, we need to understand what genocide is.

  • Genocide is defined as the deliberate killing of a specific ethnicity, nationality, or religious group.

For the UN to declare something a genocide, a specific group, usually a minority, must be targeted for their unique traits, like ethnicity.

There are 5 forms of genocide:

  1. Killing members of a group
  2. Causing grave mental or physical harm
  3. Forcing purposely terrible living conditions
  4. Preventing new births
  5. Forcing children out of the group

One of these must occur to a specific group of people for the UN to declare genocide.

Atrocities in Darfur

While the Sudanese government did deliberately kill people within Darfur, the government attempted to attack rebels. So, the government did not specifically target the ethnicity. However, the majority of the rebels were from Darfur, so some people saw it as a genocide.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • which description best presents the arrangement of continents,oceans,and landforms according to the theory of plate tectonics
    14·2 answers
  • What does separation of church and state mean?
    8·2 answers
  • William j. levitt helped th eexpansion of the american suburbs by
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT a benefit of the president?
    6·1 answer
  • How did Alexander the great establish the world's largest empire at the time?
    8·2 answers
  • What was not one of england's natural resources that fulled the industrial revolution?
    13·1 answer
  • Where did the Santa Fe, Oregon, and Mormon Trails began and end?
    6·1 answer
  • Which president made the informations shown on the map possible <br><br> Plss help
    5·2 answers
  • 1. Hazards faced by the factory workers included all of the following EXCEPT
    13·1 answer
  • What characteristics do capitalism and socialism share?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!