Answer:
My favorite is pencils because you can draw anything. It's also really helpful because when I have a bad day all I do is draw. And you can't think about anything else. I also like drawing my own little comics. The possibilities are endless
The type of executive branch nominations, including those for Cabinet members, ambassadors, and White House personnel, will determine if there will be a clash with the Senate.
<h3>
Potential for Conflict with Senate</h3>
- Although Senate confirmation serves as a crucial check on the president's appointment authority, life-tenured judicial nominations have the capacity to have a lasting impact.
- The president's policy ambitions and executive actions frequently clash with the goals of Congress.
- With life-tenured judicial appointments, such as Supreme Court justices, the stakes are extremely high because the president has the chance to continue to have influence even after taking office. In contrast, White House staff posts are frequently more simpler to fill and do not require Senate confirmation.
- To accomplish policy objectives, the president uses executive orders and policy initiatives, both of which have the potential to escalate tensions with Congress. Because presidential orders can be used to make laws without the consent or input of Congress.
To know more about Conflict with Senate refer to:
brainly.com/question/15937320
#SPJ4
Answer:
Preconventional
Explanation:
The pre-conventional level of moral reasoning is especially common in children, although adults can also exhibit this level of reasoning. Reasoners in the pre-conventional level judge the morality of an action by its direct consequences. The pre-conventional level consists of the first and second stages of moral development, and are purely concerned with the self in an egocentric manner.
In stage one, individuals focus on the direct consequences that their actions will have for themselves. For example, an action is perceived as morally wrong if the person who commits it gets punished. The worse the punishment for the act is, the more 'bad' the act is perceived to be. In addition, there is no recognition that others' points of view are any different from one's own view. This stage may be viewed as a kind of authoritarianism.
Stage two espouses the what's in it for me position, right behaviour being defined by what is in one's own best interest. Stage two reasoning shows a limited interest in the needs of others, but only to a point where it might further one's own interests, such as you scratch my back, and I'll scratch yours. In stage two concern for others is not based on loyalty or intrinsic respect. Lacking a perspective of society in the pre-conventional level, this should not be confused with social contract (stage five), as all actions are performed to serve one's own needs or interests. For the stage two theorist, the perspective of the world is often seen as morally relative.
The correct answer is classical conditioning.
Classical conditioning can be defined as the process whereby a conditioned stimulus (such as the sight of fireworks) is paired with and occurs before an unconditioned stimulus (explosive sounds), until the conditioned stimulus (the sight of fireworks) alone is able to bring about a response (such as fear reaction).
