Engaging in elections is the only way that a democracy can survive which makes the above statement factual.
<h3>How do elections aid democracy?</h3>
Democracy is based on the basic notion that the citizens of a nation should get a say in how their country is run by deciding their own leaders.
The only way citizens can be able to decide who will lead them, is by holding elections. Without elections therefore, there can be no democracy because the people would be unable to decide who would lead them.
Find out more on democracy at brainly.com/question/3710021.
This happens, though they should not be treated this way. Mentally challenged would be a more polite way to approach this situation. Please mark Brainliest!!!
Option A which is to help judge how children are treated under different political systems is the answer to the question: According to the text, which reason is not stated for studying child development?
<h3>What is child development?
</h3>
The term child development refers to the period the child grows from dependence from from parents or guardians to being an adult and independence. Child development involves learning language, growing physically, learning cultures and other things that helps one to be independent.
The period of child development is a vital period of transformation from child to adulthood and proper attention is generally required as this will help the child reach a height at which the parent or guardian wants.
As regards the question, According to the text, which reason is not stated for studying child development option A is the correct answer. and option A is to help judge how children are treated under different political systems.
Read more on child development here: brainly.com/question/18644919
#SPJ1
complete question
According to the text, which of the following is NOT a stated reason for studying child development?
A. to help judge how children are treated under different political systems
B. to better understand human nature
C. to provide help in the raising of children
D. to gain insight into social-policy issues that affect children
Answer: The correct answer is 2) Little support exist for the idea that opposites attract.
Explanation: Science says that the idea that in mate selection opposites attract is almost disproven. In fact, the more similar an individual is to their couple in terms of religion, education, age and intelligence seems to lead to couple's long term satisfaction in their relationship.
Certain researchers even go to say that even if there's a difference between the persons' cultural or religious background, at a deeper level (personality, meaning of life) they are essentialy more similar than distinct.
In conclusion, to the question: Which statement is true about mate selection? They answer would be 2) Little support exists for the idea that opposites attract.
