Jesus Christ was a man of many followers despite growing up as a carpenter's son. His lessons and teachings included patience, kindness, healing, love, and acceptance. The acceptance and love teachings were shown in many ways, one of the greatest examples being John 4-- when he associated with a samaritan woman although strictly prohibited, Matthew 14:13-21, where Jesus fed thousands from one fish and a loaf of bread, Luke 23: 26-43 where he was crucified on the cross for everyone's sins, and lastly Luke 24: where he rose again and tore the veil, leaving one of the greatest impacts on the world than ever done before. His impacts on many were easily seen and still popular today because he was the first to care so much about everyone, not just the rich or the priests of the church.
Will this do?
Yes that’s very good not gonna lie
Stream-of-consciousness is a very stylistic form of free indirect discourse. It is not spontaneous, or unintentional, or anything of the sort. In fact, if anything, it's just the opposite. It's highly stylized, but also purposeful and calculating. It sees the world wholly through the character's mind instead of through their senses, save for how the mind and the senses interact.
It relates to a lot of things - free association, synesthesia, free indirect discourse, without actually being any of them.
<span>There's only a handful of writers that can actually do stream-of-consciousness writing with any success - Joyce and Faulkner come to mind immediately. In short, there's nothing wrong with trying it, but there's also nothing wrong with not having done that, but having done, say, free association instead.</span>
The first one.
Explanation:
In this first one, the author is pulling apart what the evidence means (analysing it).
In the 2nd, it is NOT analyzing a piece of evidence specifically, it's summarizes the point and says it's supported by the evidence. So, not analyzing.
In the 3rd, the author is applying it to the situation and explaining why it's important, which is different from analysis.
In the 4th, the author is offering an example as evidence, not analyzing a piece of evidence.
