Poverty and poor relief, especially in times of acute food shortages, were major challenges facing Virginia and Confederate authorities during the American Civil War (1861–1865). At first, most Confederates were confident that hunger would not be a problem for their nation.
The colonization period in Haiti was difficult, one of the hardest ones in all the Americas, the slavery was cataloged as the cruelest ever known, and the general live conditions for middle and lower classes were not good at all.
At the bottom of the social pyramid were the slaves, however the french soldiers had really hard duties on those times, they can be cataloged like <em>¨White slaves¨</em>, obviously they haven´t to perform the slave´s work, however duties turning around the slavery, extended shifts and dreadful life conditions made their work a difficult one.
So Haitian Slaves and French soldiers were technically in a similar spot, however, the slaves had survival and another kind of advantages over the French soldiers, a key point was the resistance or partial immunity to different diseases, unfortunately, that wasn´t the French´s case.
Yellow fever was a major issue to the French forces in Haiti, debilitated the army, and was one of the key points of the posterior events (the slavery and Haiti revolutions).
So definitely the two kinds of newcomers to Haiti, haven´t the same fate, the majority of slaves adapted quickly to new territory. the opposite happened to the French soldiers.
Answer:
There is no correct answer
Explanation:
I know this may not be exactly what you are looking for but each of these problems: women's suffrage, forest preservation and child labor are extremly to different groups of people but there are no less important than the other.
For women fighting for equality has been fundamental for the progress of society, forest preservation is a very important topic for many conservationalist and ecologist who are trying to commbat climate change and child labor should be an issue that is very important for everyone, no matter where this problems is happening.
So, I dont believe this question has a correct answer but it does have different angles
The larger state, the more votes. If the state has a large population the state have more votes to give. The states vote as blocks. So if 51% of people vote for a candidate in a state it is if 100% votes for that candidate. <span> 9 states in America have nearly 60% of the US population. So without this system the whole race would only involve only those 9, and within those 9 only the massive cities they have. Ex. Chicago, New York, LA etc.</span>
1.Laws controlling monopolies,
2.The Clayton Antitrust Act,
3.The Federal Trade Commission
Let me know if you need something different.
