By process of elimination the answer is D, I know the rest are true.
<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
Potter's Historical Interpretations of the Civil War:
Students of history state that he had a lopsided scholarly history, since he offered a dimension of tolerance to the genius bondage philosophies that he doesn't grant to the abolitionist subjugation development. Abolitionists were everything from oppressive to helpful people, as per Potter.
Holt's Historical Interpretation of the Civil War:
Holt, then again, was a teacher so he given an increasingly clear translation of the Civil War, indeed, Holt sees the contention as a breakdown in America's majority rule political procedure. No longer contrasts must be settled inside the field of fight, as per him.
Africa was badly harmed by the slave trade. The trade made war more common, harmed the economies and society’s of the nations from which slaves came, and eventually made it easier for Africa to be colonized by the Europeans.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "it was not as good as it seems." <span>During the Constitutional Convention blank proposed the addition of a Bill of Rights to the Constitution itself but his proposal was voted down because </span><span>it was not as good as it seems</span>
<span>the correct answer is traces its roots to pioneering work</span>
