Broadly speaking, Mercantilism was very good for European countries for a while but terrible for their colonies.
Mercantilism made people in the Old World VERY rich.
But, as a result of the imbalance, the relationship between the European countries and their colonies deteriorated making mercantilism good in the short term but bad in the long term.
Rulers of land-based empires in the Middle East and East Asia used bureaucratic elites and military professions to create centralized control over populations and resources.
<h3>Describe the imperial expansion from 1450 to 1750.</h3>
Increased use of gunpowder, cannons and armed trade led to the establishment of vast empires in Europe and Asia. Most of the subjugated tribes were unorganized or weak. The Manchu in Central East Asia, the Mughal in South and Central Asia, the Ottoman in Southern Europe, and the Middle East, and North Africa were some of these land-based empires.
Politics, religion, and the armed forces were all under the control of the same people. They also had control over trade, which allowed the monarchs to build more powerful armies and cultural landmarks. Religion, art, and architecture were all used by rulers to justify their dominion. To raise money for state power and imperial expansion, they used new tax collection methods and mechanisms for collecting tribute.
To learn more about imperial expansion, visit:
brainly.com/question/16569775
#SPJ1
Answer:
I would guess A. Minorities were not allowed to attend schools with whites
Explanation:
I hope this answer is correct.
have a great FALL break!
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "D Africans were generally able to hide from or defend themselves against Europeans." Europeans generally buy slaves from slave traders rather than capturing the slaves themselves because D Africans were generally able to hide from or defend themselves against Europeans.<span>
</span>
Answer:
A. Serbia,
Why: It achieved independence in 1867.
