1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lisa [10]
3 years ago
5

Explain in 1-2 complete sentences why the colonists in Maryland didn't want to pay the king's taxes after the French and Indian

war, especially since they had no representation (voice) in English government.
History
1 answer:
Ahat [919]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

They felt the taxes violated their rights as British citizens.

Explanation:

The colonists in Maryland didn't want to pay the king's taxes after the French and Indian war, especially since they had no representation (voice) in the English government, because "they felt the taxes violated their rights as British citizens."

Also, just like other American colonists at the time, they felt that those taxes are high and "Intolerable, " for them to pay.

You might be interested in
Plz help I will mark you brainlist plz ​
Advocard [28]

Answer:

I am writing this document today because I feel like I am oppressed and ignored at school. I believe that public schools should have teachers that care for their students. That they should help out the students more instead of ignoring them. That they should help us with our work instead of just piling it on us and expecting us to do it all in one day. I go to school everyday to learn and i dont learn anything if the teachers don't care to teach, but to ignore.

As a student my rights are to get a good education, learn, and to have the materials in order to succeed in school so i have a good education. I should have the right to take a day out of school for being sick or for a family emergency and not have to worry about getting marked absent and have to worry about coming back to school and having a pile of work to do. I come to school to learn not to have to worry that if I don't get my grade up I'll fail or if i dont turn something in I'll be in trouble. I believe I have the rights and responsibilities as a student to get a good education and not have to worry about missing assignments because all that does is make me father behind in class because when I work on them I start to get behind on what i'm learning now because i can't pay attention to it.

I believe that the school has failed at what they do because they hire people who don't seem to care. I go to school to learn and if i don't have anyone to teach me then how will I be able to learn? A school should be paying attention to students and caring for them instead of not paying attention and letting any and everything happen in them. A school is supposed to be a place where kids should feel safe and not have to worry about getting hurt especially if it happens in their homes.

I declare that I should have the rights to learn and have teachers who care. That i should feel safe in school and be able to get a good meal. That i should be able to learn and not worry about falling behind because of missing assignments. That is, I as a student should be provided with the right materials to work and be able to get my education for a good future and to be able to get a good job. I will defend this by standing my ground and helping others when the teacher doesn't care and making sure that even if the teachers can't teach me I can still learn from the materials and books in the school.

4 0
3 years ago
Please help. No links. No nonsense.
Ghella [55]

Answer: One major difference is that King's believes that slavery didn't play a role, while Burns' does. A historical event that could support King's is when Congress established the Freedmen's Bureau in 1865. This provided aid to African Americans in their transition from slavery to freedom. A historical event that could support Burns' is Dred Scott v. Sandford. The case in 1857 declared that slaves and blacks descended from slaves and were not American citizens and cannot sue, so this could have led to outrage and war.

3 0
3 years ago
What other leaders can you compare pol pot?
zvonat [6]

Answer:

The Cambodian pol pot was a true leader and egalitarian, a champion of traditional cultural traditions and an authentic way of life, and no dictator. There was a mistake. His goal was to end the collapse of Cambodia's imperialist colonialism, return to traditional villages and create a new nation from scratch.

Explanation:

Answer is above

<em><u>Hope this helps.</u></em>

6 0
3 years ago
The African American family under slavery a was always matriarchal. b was nonexistent on most plantations. c was protected by th
vazorg [7]

Answer:

B

pregnant slaves were a profit and sold their kids at auctions

4 0
3 years ago
Does the emancipation proclamation<br> increase black citizens tax rate?
Julli [10]

Answer:

yes or no

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which best describes De Soto's relationship with the Native Americans?
    14·2 answers
  • Which is the BEST description of the difference between a republic and a democracy? A) There is no difference between these two
    12·2 answers
  • How might invention of the telegraph have affected global diplomacy
    13·1 answer
  • 3) The Articles of Confederation did not provide for a<br> or a system of law or justice.
    5·1 answer
  • The ___ was the alliance of Germany, Italy, and Japan during World War Two
    15·1 answer
  • C is the wrong one!! I'd really appreciate it if you would help me:D​
    9·1 answer
  • I NEED HELP PLEASE
    6·1 answer
  • What does adam smith say the purpose of the mercantile system is?
    8·1 answer
  • What were some of the principal commodities traded in and out of the islamic states
    6·1 answer
  • What does "Civil Disobedience" suggest about the jailer’s opinion of Thoreau's arrest for tax evasion? Tax evasion was not a ser
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!