Answer:
Explanation:
This is the famous case of Hamer vs Sidway in which the court decided forbearance is in facr legal consideration and held the contract valid. Here is a summary:
The Court of Appeals reversed and directed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed, with costs payable out of the estate. Judge Alton Parker (later Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals), writing for a unanimous court, wrote that the forbearance of legal rights by Story II, namely the consensual abstinence from "drinking liquor, using tobacco, swearing, and playing cards or billiards for money until he should become 21 years of age" constituted consideration in exchange for the promise given by Story I. Because the forbearance was valid consideration given by a party (Story II) in exchange for a promise to perform by another party (Story I), the promise was contractually obligated to fulfill the promise.
hi guys pls friend me i need freinds pls
Answer:
the answer is the fifth one
Explanation:
Confederal, would be a good answer.
