Why did the Supreme Court deem two policies of the First New Deal unconstitutional?

History

2 answers:

Veseljchak [2.6K]2 years ago

8 0

- The NRA controversies (allowed too much power)

Georgia [21]2 years ago

6 0

Answer choices are:

A. All of these

B. the Supreme Court did not see any economic impact and wanted to restrict the New Deal

C. Believed the policies to involve the federal government too much in the regulation (control) of private businesses

D. Presidents are only allowed one major piece of legislation during their time in office

Correct answer choice is:

C. Believed the policies to involve the federal government too much in the regulation (control) of private businesses.

The first sign that the New Deal was at risk was a hassle with the National Rifle Association. Opposition to the National Rifle Association came to a head in 1935, once the conservative Supreme Court declared the agency unconstitutional, claiming the National Rifle Association gave the chief branch regulative powers that belonged solely to Congress.

You might be interested in

Which of these was an effect of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, on the current federal immigration guidelines

Masja [62]

From the moment the first plane hit the North Tower, the immigration system in the United States was destined to change.

The attacks on September 11, 2001 certainly didn't start the country's immigration debate, but it did alter the course of the discussion.

Immigration was already a staple of the nightly news through the 1990s into the 2000s. After a series of free trade agreements realigned economies in Mexico and Central America, millions of migrants headed to northern Mexico and the U.S. looking for work.

"After 9/11, the Bush administration tried to see immigration enforcement as a way to fight terrorism," Burnham said. "And it's just not."
so the answer D

8 0

3 years ago

Please I really need help this is due tomorrow :((((((

vovikov84 [41]

Explanation:

i hope this helped lol jsjazmkzjz