Why did some of the colonies demand the Bill of Rights be added to our Constitution before they would agree to follow it?

Social Studies

1 answer:

Alexxandr [17]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

They were concerned that a powerful central government would choose to do what they want, just like a king, and ignore what their citizens wanted.

Explanation:

This country was initially created because the founding fathers did not want United States to adopt a monarchy system of government. Despite that, it is impassible to manage different states as one nation without the existence of a federal government.

This is why the constitution was created.

it act as a clear guideline to determine the roles/capabilities of both federal government and the state government. When it's proposed, the states feared that the constitution will give the feds with the power to take complete control over the people and transform this country into a tyranny. This is why some of them demand the Bill of Rights be added. The Bill of Rights guaranteed basic rights of the citizens that can't be violated by the federal government under any circumstances.

You might be interested in

Which neolithic revolution development led to the other three?

liberstina [14]

I think that the agriculture revolution led to the other three

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

in pre-world war ii germany, massive fascist propaganda campaigns swept the country in order to promote and allow freedom of the

cestrela7 [59]

That statement is False

During pre world war II ,germany oppress the freedom of press And led the country to believe in Nazi's point of view and gain the support of Germany's people for the war

hope this helps

7 0

3 years ago

How do some nonprofit organizations promote the interests of workers and consumers?

Mekhanik [1.2K]

A nonprofit organization utilizes its surplus incomes to additionally accomplish its motivation or mission, instead of conveying its surplus pay to the association's shareholders as benefit or profits. Assignment as a not-for-profit does not imply that the association does not mean to make a benefit, but instead that the association has no "proprietors" and that the assets acknowledged in the operation of the association won't be utilized to profit any proprietors.

3 0

3 years ago

For whom did the Supreme Court rule in Worcester v. Georgia

iren [92.7K]

The court chose Worcestor because it was a peaceful tribe

8 0

3 years ago

Worth 25 points!!

Alona [7]

Answer:

New mexico

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago