Answer:
B, Asia, to retaliate for the attack on Pearl Harbor
The Constitution reflected Enlightenment distrust of powerful central governments. It established three separate branches of government to provide a built-in system of checks and balances that would prevent any one branch from gaining too much power.
Answer:
A hero is a person who does something good, while heroism is the actual emotions and reason behing these good or brave actions. An idol is someone who is looked up to by many, even if not all idols are good people. A hero, on the other hand, is generally a good or courageous person. Heroism is the WHY and Heros and Idols and the who.
Explanation:
I did my best, sorry if there aren't three defined differences : /
Answer:
A. a president is more likely to appoint judges who would agree with him ideologically.
Explanation:
According to the Constitution, it is President who nominates judges for federal courts and the Supreme Court. After the nomination, it is Senate who appoint them based on informal criteria, as there's no criteria mentioned in the Constitution.
The most likely reason that appointment of judges by President is blocked is because the president is appointing judges who would agree with him ideologically. The Senate will block such nominations to ensure that judges who are appointed judge with justice and not under any influence from any political power.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Best answer among those choices: a. He was seen by some leaders as an anticommunist bulwark.
Details/context:
The other answers are not correct, so the "anticommunist bulwark" answer is the best available. There was some of that feeling in Europe's western democracies at that time. However, the bigger factor was simply that Britain wasn't ready to confront Germany and go to war.
An article by Dr. G. Bruce Strang of Brandon University, in the journal, <em>Diplomacy and Statecraft </em>(September 2008), explains:
- <em>The British government's appeasement of fascism in the 1930s derived not only from economic, political, and strategic constraints, but also from the personal ideologies of the policy makers. Widespread guilt about the terms of the Versailles Treaty and tensions with France created sympathy for German revisionism, but the Cabinet properly recognized that Nazi Germany represented the gravest threat to peace in the 1930s. Fear of war and the recognition that Britain would have to tolerate peaceful change underlay attempts to appease the dictators, culminating in the Munich agreement in September 1938. ... While most of the British elite detested communism, anti-communist views did not govern British policy; security considerations required Soviet support in Eastern Europe, and Britain and France made a determined effort to secure Soviet support for the Peace Front.</em>
