Answer: He argued for more imperialism and more isolationism.
Explanation:
Isolationism is the diplomatic policy followed by a country that aims to be less active on the international scene. They avoid getting entangled in the affairs of other nations and prefer to focus on domestic activities.
Imperialism on the other hand, is the policy followed by a country that aims to acquire control of the resources of other countries or peoples by force or otherwise. This is where colonization falls under and it evidently does not involve isolationism.
There is therefore no contradiction in Option A because a country can be less imperialistic and still be active on the international scene.
Options B and C do not contradict each other.
Option D alone shows a contradiction as a country cannot be more imperialistic and more isolationist at the same time.
Answer:
:Physiotherapists help people affected by injury, illness or disability through movement and exercise, manual therapy, education and advice. They maintain health for people of all ages, helping patients to manage pain and prevent disease.
To put it in a simple sentence is because they help people affected by injuries and help maintain health for everyone all ages.
hopes this helps :)
Answer:
A In 1850, the United States contained 31 states and 4 organized territories (Minnesota, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah). The 1850 United States census can be seen as a historical document that gives insight into the state of the nation's economy in 1850. so I would go with FACT
B Yes Fact
C Opinion
Explanation:
<em>A. Anti-Federalists.</em>
Explanation:
The Bill of Rights are known to be the first 10 amendments in the United States Constitution. This protects citizens freedom, and their freedom from the government, which was a huge problem for the Anti-Federalists. The Anti-Federalists did not want a constitution that gave too much power to the central government, they were scared the government would abuse their power, just like Great Britain did with them, with the strict laws and "taxation without representation." The Federalists did not believe the Bill of Rights was necessary to go along with the U.S. Constitution, but the Anti-Federalists insisted in having one to protect their freedom from the government.