Answer:
For a point defined bt a radius R, and an angle θ measured from the positive x-axis (like the one in the image)
The transformation to rectangular coordinates is written as:
x = R*cos(θ)
y = R*sin(θ)
Here we are in the unit circle, so we have a radius equal to 1, so R = 1.
Then the exact coordinates of the point are:
(cos(θ), sin(θ))
2) We want to mark a point Q in the unit circle sch that the tangent has a value of 0.
Remember that:
tan(x) = sin(x)/cos(x)
So if sin(x) = 0, then:
tan(x) = sin(x)/cos(x) = 0/cos(x) = 0
So tan(x) is 0 in the points such that the sine function is zero.
These values are:
sin(0°) = 0
sin(180°) = 0
Then the two possible points where the tangent is zero are the ones drawn in the image below.
55+(x+25)=180
55+x+25=180
25+55+x=180
80+x=180
x=180-80
x=100
Step-by-step explanation:
The slope of the line passing through two points is given by,
13)
option D
14)
option C
15)
option B
16)
option C
2/7=0.28571428571428571428571428571429
0.28571428571428571428571428571429*3=0.85714285714285714285714285714286
that is a long answer but it works
Answer:
Following are the solution to this question:
Step-by-step explanation:
For this set, the correlation coefficient is = -0.015.
It shows that financial variables have trust issues. Once a price rises, the other one is decreasing the value of -0,015 shows, that there are several fewer associations in the set of data among x and y and between y values. This interaction also can range between -1 to 1, to 0 being completely unrelated. But you'd never be sure, in this situation, 0.015 is very similar to 0.
It means that your prediction is nothing better than just a wild choice. Its odds of an estimated value being relatively close to the actual result are therefore much smaller as the points are it's hardly the best match.
