1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
meriva
3 years ago
5

Which statement best explains why Thomas Jefferson identified with the ideas of John Locke?

History
1 answer:
Arada [10]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

A Locke provided Jefferson with the idea of government as a social contract

Explanation:

Okay, first of all, Locke and Jefferson weren't even alive at the same time since B, C, and D, either directly reference or greatly imply that Locke and Jefferson had direct contact, they are wrong. Locke also wasn't a soldier, he was too smart for that so B is wrong 2x. Locke also wasn't in America or France, so if they had been alive in the same time period, they still wouldn't have been in direct contact. And the last one just isn't right, so we're done here.

hope this helps:)

You might be interested in
The term laissez-faire literally means __________.
jonny [76]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Let them act

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
BEST ANSWER GETS BRAINLEIST 20 PTS
AlekseyPX

Hello Bunny Pop! 


Here is your answer


When the United States entered World War I in 1917, Germans were the single largest ethnic group in Minnesota. Nativism during this period was a “patriotic” attitude that saw recent immigrants—particularly those of German descent— as potentially traitorous. Many felt that because German Americans shared their heritage with the Kaiser and the German Empire, they would side with the enemy power. That many German Americans advocated neutrality until the U.S. declared war was further proof of disloyalty to nativists.

The most conspicuous nativist agency was the Minnesota Commission of Public Safety (MCPS). Created by the state legislature in April of 1917, the MCPS was a seven-person commission headed by Governor J. A. A. Burnquist. It was given near-dictatorial powers to support the war effort at home and root out disloyal elements. While much of the commission’s activity focused on attacking labor advocates and political dissenters in the Nonpartisan League and the Industrial Workers of the World, the MCPS kept a close watch on German Americans as well. There was, in fact, much cross-over between these two groups, since many German Americans were both socialists and pacifists.

The MCPS took drastic action in dealing with a gathering in New Ulm on July 25, 1917. The meeting was organized by Brown County Auditor Louis Vogel, Mayor Dr. Louis Fritsche, and city attorney Albert Pfaender. Its agenda was to discuss the constitutionality of the draft. The MCPS and its agents already suspected Pfaender and Fritsche of sedition. A month later, Burnquist had them both deposed.

Another victim of the July 25 rally was Adolph Ackermann, president of Dr. Martin Luther College. During the demonstration, he gave a speech questioning the government’s motive for entering the war. In response to his comments, the MCPS coerced the college to force Ackermann’s resignation.

Nativism sometimes served personal and business interests. After Fritsche was removed from office, the MCPS pressured the State Medical Society and the Brown–Redwood County Society to revoke the ex-mayor’s medical certification. Two doctors on the review panel who voted against Fritsche ran practices in Springfield, a town in keen business competition with New Ulm. Fritsche was eventually exonerated.

Another vested-interest case unfolded in Springfield, where mostly German American stakeholders proposed creating a new bank. The president of the existing State Bank of Springfield submitted the names of those stakeholders to the MCPS to investigate their loyalty.

Some members of the Catholic Church also stood to benefit from anti-German policies. Archbishop John Ireland had long promoted the “Americanization” of the Church. During the war, this attitude gained ground. The archbishop urged that English should be the only language of church liturgy—a move that alienated German Catholics and their clergy, who conducted mass in German. This division allowed many Irish Catholics to assume leadership positions at the expense of their German counterparts.

The German-language press was an obvious target. The MCPS kept a close eye on many of these publications. Albert Steinhauser, publisher of the New Ulm Post and the New Ulm Review, featured many German articles in his papers that criticized the war. Under pressure from the commission, he was arrested and expelled from the Minnesota State Editorial Association in 1918. Even more severe, federal authorities jailed Volkszeitung editor Frederick W. Bergmeier of St. Paul for the duration of the war.

German Minnesotans responded to nativism in different ways. While many spoke their minds and suffered, others kept quiet and out of sight. Some became vehement and vocal “patriots” or “100% Americans” in order to deflect suspicion. A few even spied on other Germans for the MCPS. The replacements for both Fritsche and Pfaender were themselves German Americans. Bishop Busch, the stalwart “Americanizer,” was of Austrian stock.

The MCPS and other officials both represented and sanctioned a general culture of fear and hostility against German Americans. Such antagonism manifested itself throughout society at large. Indeed, many of the investigations conducted by the commission were petitioned by private citizens. This created a climate of paranoia and violence. Fritsche and his family, after his disgrace, lived in fear of their well-being and lives; this was by no means unusual for victims of nativism. Nativist Minnesotans boycotted their German neighbors’ stores, vandalized their property, and called for them to resign from their jobs.

When World War I ended, so did much of the MCPS’s justification. It was abolished by legislative act in 1919 and met for the last time in 1920. With the commission’s demise and the end of the war, anti-German nativism lost much of its momentum.


Hope this helps and answers your question. I wish you the best of luck! :) 

6 0
4 years ago
Which of these philosophies is most appealing to you?
tangare [24]
Answer:
What are the options?
5 0
3 years ago
In the colonial days of colombia: landowners built castles the poeple prayed at sunset indians worked for no pay the farms were
ruslelena [56]

c. indians work for no pay

7 0
3 years ago
Who was one of the biggest proponents of a separate Muslim state?
cricket20 [7]
Muhammad Ali Jinnah was the biggest proponents of a separate Muslim state. He was a prominent lawyer, politician and also the founder of the country named Pakistan. He was born on 25th of December 1876 and died on 11th of September 1948. The place of his birth as well as his death was Karachi. Muhammad Ali Jinnah was the leader of All India Muslim League from the tear 1913 until the day Pakistan got separated from India to form a new country. He became the first Governor General of Pakistan and remained in the same post until the day of his death.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was the German War machine very productive at the beginning of WW2? What happened to make it so unleathal towards the end of
    6·1 answer
  • A period of widespread fear and suspicion that communists and soviets spies were infiltrating the U.S government
    5·1 answer
  • Which global warming policy did the Obama administration favor?
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME !!!!
    6·2 answers
  • The Tiananmen Square Massacre was a response to
    6·1 answer
  • To what extent was the populist movement a practical, liberal response to the political and economic problems of the gilded age?
    6·1 answer
  • Hy did women have the right to vote first in the West before most other areas of the country?
    11·1 answer
  • 1. What similarities exist between Rome and the United States? 2. Do you feel the United States is in the process of decline as
    9·1 answer
  • True or False Blaming the president for their plight, people preferred to shantytown sad coolidgeviles
    12·1 answer
  • What did countries do to retaliate in the Great Depression
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!