Answer:
$3,170.73 billion
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Required reserve ratio, r = 0.10
currency ratio, c = 0.30
excess reserve ratio, e = 0.01
The monetary base, MB = $1,000 billion
Formula for money multiplier, m =
on substituting the respective values, we get
m =
or
m =
or
m = 3.17073
Now,
Money supply, M = m × MB
or
M = 3.17073 × $1,000 billion
or
M = $3,170.73 billion
Answer:
d. treasury and top-grade corporate bonds pay interest two times each year
Explanation:
Treasury bonds represent the best solution for investing, having in mind the <u>low-risk aspect</u> and the fact that they are <u>issued by the government</u>. Treasury and top-grade corporate bonds always pay <u>semiannual interests</u>.
<em>Junk bonds</em> should not be even considered in risk-free options, as a junk bond is a bond issued by a struggling company, which may happen not to pay any interest sometimes.
<em>Common stock</em> does not necessarily have to pay quarterly dividends, as some companies pay dividends monthly, or even annually. Also, the risk is still lower in treasury bonds, as common stock becomes questionable in the case of company liquidation. If and when that happens, common stockholders gain rights to company assets only after bondholders and preferred shareholders become paid.
The default risk is present in all bonds, including <em>Yankee bonds</em>, which are issued by foreign companies in the USA.
A capitalized value of land is the value of the land calculated on Total return per year divided by the interest rate.
The capitalized value of land = Return on land per year ÷ Interest rate
Where Return on land per year = $750
Interest Rate = 7%
The capitalized value of land = $ 750 ÷ 0.07
= $ 10,714.29
Therefore, the capitalized value of land if the interest rate is 7% is $ 10,714.29.
Profits will increase if resource prices are fixed and the product selling price rises
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": False.
Explanation:
Social loafing is the act in which employees underperform while given tasks individually compared when working in groups. Under this scenario, it is unlikely employers would provide extra compensation to workers because their productivity does not justify the reward.