I'm pretty sure that the answer is D. Usually
The best rebuttal to this anti-burn viewpoint is this:
- Without the controlled fire, more fuel may have built up, leading to greater damage.
<h3 /><h3>What is a rebuttal?</h3>
A rebuttal is a rejection of a previously stated claim. In the passage above, the claim is that the controlled fire caused significant losses to the people and environment.
But if there is a rebuttal that claims that the controlled fire was helpful because it greatly limited the reach of the burn, then we can consider that as a valid rebuttal.
A rebuttal is meant to find a fault in the claim and gives a reason why the opposite of the claim is accurate.
Learn more about rebuttals here:
brainly.com/question/24690335
#SPJ1
1. <span>d-Phrases like “worst choice ever” and “too silly” convey her frustration.
The narrator's frustration with her brothers, and the fact that she blames them for part of ruining her vacation is clear here.
2. </span><span>consuming
Eating is a very bland word, it doesn't give much indication on how hungry she was or excited she was about the food. Consuming is equally as bland a word.
3. </span><span>The language shows the author's biases.
Word choice throughout this piece shows the extreme emotional bias the narrator has towards the vacation. </span>
Answer:
um sure. always here to help
Explanation:
It's true stage directions aren't spoken aloud.
