Answer:
Plz mark me Brainliest.
Explanation:
The Shark Tank investors decline Mo's deal because they think that they didn't need his help, as stated in the text, "But none of the sharks wanted to take the deal I’d offered. They told us we didn’t need their help, that we were growing at the right speed and should keep the company’s ownership for ourselves."
Possibly because they wanted their jobs back. Back in the day, employers hired and underpaid immigrants and therefore firing white people that were paid more. Since immigrants accepted less pay, for the same work done by a white person, white people wanted the immigrants to be fired so they could get their jobs back.
The explicit statement in paragraph 4 that leaves no implicit suggestions is;
- Biologists backed up these ideas with sketches and models based on known animals.
An explicit statement is one that leaves nothing to the imagination. It states facts that are not open to interpretation.
The stated facts are clearly understood. In the third option, the author states a fact that is easily understood and that is not prone to interpretations.
It is just a clear fact that the Biologists backed up their ideas with sketches and models.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/863984
Magma rises through cracks or weaknesses in the Earth's crust. When this pressure is released, eg as a result of plate movement, magma explodes to the surface causing a volcanic eruption<span>. </span>
