Answer:
America’s global military power is so commonplace that it’s easy to overlook how historically unique it is. What’s so unusual and world-changing is not the extent of America’s military, political and economic capacities — but the absence of countries that come anywhere close.
America’s historically anomalous position as a sole superpower with no near peer ended the balance-of-power geopolitics that organized much of world affairs for more than a thousand years — and will fundamentally shape a new geopolitics for at least the next generation.
The United States also derives geopolitical power from its singular capacity to develop new technologies and other valuable intellectual property in large volumes, especially in the software and Internet areas that drive so much economic change and the processes of globalization itself.
Explanation:
The conclusion that we can draw is that a. Twain believed the United States did not have a right to the territories it held overseas.
<h3>What were Twain's views on imperialism?</h3><h3 />
The relevant excerpt is not attached but the answer can be inferred based on Twain's historical views.
Mark Twain was against American imperialism and believed that the U.S. should not inflict upon others, what the British had inflicted on them.
He would therefore most likely believe that the U.S. did not have a right to the foreign lands it possessed.
Find out more on Mark Twain at brainly.com/question/11926015.
#SPJ1
I will answer the three options based on different kind of perspective of a person:
- I would chose the first option to escape and flee with my family to another part of Africa if my co-workers wouldn't agree with me in Options 2 or 3. It would be a personal option to escape because its for my own's best self-interest to survive in the world and avoid punishment.
- I would chose the second option to appeal to the missionaries or the authorities even the king if the work crew also agreed and have the same view of what's happening and in order to avoid a bloody and chaotic movement for reforms.
- I would only chose the last option to take arms if it is necessary and peaceful solution has failed. Also this is only possible if everyone in the work crew has the same views with me and lost hope for a peaceful reforms.
The main way in which Hoover expected social services to be provided to poor Americans was that he "<span>hoped private charities would take care of the needs of poor Americans," since he was very much against government intervention in the economy, unlike his successor FDR.
</span>
