The above question wants to analyze your arguing ability. So I can't write the argument for you, but I'll show you how to write it.
<h3>What is an argument?</h3>
- It's an opinion.
- It is an opinion based on facts.
- It is an opinion that can be proven.
So, to write your argument, you must first establish your opinion about what might happen in the second season of the show. This opinion must be constructed based on facts shown by the show.
In that case, you will show your opinion and write the reasons that the show shows to confirm that you are correct.
More information on what an argument is at the link:
brainly.com/question/15769666
Answer:
Such results only tell us how well one is programmed to regurgitate mostly useless information, mostly in regards to one of 7 kinds of intelligence.
This can be a good indicator on whether or not a person will be able to handle even higher amounts of regurgitation of information at the university level. The hope is that students will major in a study that will at least expose them to the tools of critical thinking, which is mostly limited to the hard sciences.
“Learners” who score high can will feel overblown grandiose feelings, and see themselves as superior to those with lower scores, regardless of their future accomplishments (or lack of them). “Learners” who score low will tend to feel humbled and maybe depressed, in that they are typecast as being somehow unable to be much of a future contributor to society.
Fortunately, a significant number of people at ANY point of the spectrum of such scoring to see how well trained a monkey they are, realize the absurdity of such scoring, and go on to find out where they DO excel in one of the other 7 kinds of intelligence. They often end up contributing MORE to society, once they find there “gift” where they “score” much higher
Explanation:
