Answer:
Becky, because her justification for the second statement should be "definition of supplementary angles" rather than "angle addition postulate."
Step-by-step explanation:
Becky completed the proof incorrectly because her justification for the second statement is not totally correct.
Angle addition postulate does not really apply here, as the sum of 2 angles may not give you exactly 180°.
However, the second statement, m<AKG + m<GKB = 180° and m<GKB + m<HKB = 180°, can be justified by the "Definition of Supplementary Angles".
The sum of supplementary angles = 180°.
Therefore, Becky completed the proof incorrectly.
To solve<span> a logarithmic equation, rewrite the equation in exponential form and </span>solve<span>for the variable</span>
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
4 (x - 7) - 2 (x + 1) = 10
x = 10
B. -2 (x - 7) + (x + 1) = 5
x = 10
your equation is equivalent to B!
