Answer corret GRAMMER DANGGG
Explanation:
Correctional institution workers are the social workers who are the mental health professional who work in a correctional field.
<u>Explanation:</u>
A correctional social worker who is also known as prison or jail social worker is a mental health professional. He runs programs and makes sure that the jail inmates are ready to return to the society once they are released from the jail and have to go back to normal life.
The correction social worker perform psychological assessments to determine inmates' level of mental health functioning, the evaluation of the mental health of the inmates or the substance abuse disorders, providing group or individual counselling session to the inmates of the prison.
Because the framers of the United States Constitution (written in 1787) believed that protecting property rights relating to inventions would encourage the new nation’s economic growth, they gave Congress—the national legislature—a constitutional mandate to grant patents for inventions. The resulting patent system has served as a model for those in other nations. Recently, however, scholars have questioned whether the American system helped achieve the framers’ goals. These scholars have contended that from 1794 to roughly 1830, American inventors were unable to enforce property rights because judges were “anticipate” and routinely invalidated patents for arbitrary reasons. This argument is based partly on examination of court decisions in cases where patent holders (“patentees”) brought suit alleging infringement of their patent rights. In the 1820s, for instance, 75 percent of verdicts were decided against the patentee. The proportion of verdicts for the patentee began to increase in the 1830s, suggesting to these scholars that judicial attitudes toward patent rights began shifting then.
To learn more about protecting property rights visit here ; brainly.com/question/28388414?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
Answer:
No it must be signed by the president
The primary difference between law enforcement in Canada and the USA, as many here have already noted, emanates from the following: criminal law in Canada falls solely under federal jurisdiction. This reality begets a uniformity in police training here, although I’d argue that there’s no parity in quality. This contrasts notably with America, where criminal law is both a federal and state matter. The resulting convoluted and inefficient law enforcement, furthermore, essentially mirrors that of American governance as well.
While some assert that Canadian policing is more professional, I think our law enforcement is less politicised than American. Reflecting how American governance emphasises local autonomy, Sheriffs are elected in the USA, something unheard of in Canada. Likewise, the idea of electing a Crown Prosecutor is considered absurd here.
As others have already answered, Canadian policing includes the RCMP, provincial police in Ontario and Quebec, and municipal police forces. Regarding the RCMP, there’s no real American equivalent to it in my opinion, because American law enforcement historically never had paramilitary origins as did the NWMP. The often derided pop historian, Pierre Burton, was correct in describing the original Mountie as a British soldier. Not only did this differentiate the history of Canada’s West from America’s, but facilitated the evolution of a different policing culture here, altogether.
