Answer:
False
Explanation:
Judicial review is Necessary in the United states for a treaty.
More here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_review
Hope This Helped!
The Supreme Court has not become more restrictive in protecting the right to privacy, so this claim is false.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- The Supreme Court understood that the right to privacy is essential to protect citizens, especially those involved in marginalized situations.
- For this reason, the Supreme Court decided to expand the privacy rights and not restrict them as shown in the question above.
This supreme court attitude is intended to promote greater protection for individuals who are marginalized and who may suffer intolerant and life-threatening attacks.
More information:
brainly.com/question/1145825?referrer=searchResults
When state law and federal law conflict, federal law displaces, or preempts, state law, due to the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution. ... Preemption applies regardless of whether the conflicting laws come from legislatures, courts, administrative agencies, or constitutions.
