Answer:
D. Adult Judge
Explanation:
A survey conducted by the American Youth Policy Forum(AYPF) in 2004 revealed that Youth courts used an estimate of;
1. 40% of the adult judge model
2. 26% of the peer jury model
2. 17% of the youth judge model
3. 9% of a combination of models
4. 8% of the youth tribunal
We can thus infer that most teen courts use the adult judge as the decision maker.
When juveniles commit offences their cases can be held in a court presided over by peers who are in the same age bracket with them. A youth judge presides over the case most times. A panel or jury made up of other youth judges sometimes numbering up to six deliberate over the matter and make a decision that would be announced to the court. Restorative justice is applied most of the time.
The sentencing administered by the teen court might include sending the offender to a rehabilitation center so that the main factor that caused his or her misbehavior can be corrected.
Answer:
I think the answer is public nuisance.
Explanation:
I believe this because it is not an invasion of privacy at all, it can't be trespassing because she is not trespassing, it is not intentional even though she did ignore your claims.
Hope this helps.
Another way that media coverage changes the way that judges and juries act in the legal system, is by giving them extra information into the case, or the clients behind the case. ... This means that from the moment a juror enters the courtroom, they're already biased in the way they make decisions regarding the case.
Answer:
The ruling was made by a lower court than the court hearing the current case.
Some of the facts of the original case are significantly different than the current case.
The judge in the original case did not have jurisdiction to try the case.
Explanation:
1, 5,4
The answer to this question will be D
