1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IRINA_888 [86]
3 years ago
5

Question 5 (4 points)

History
1 answer:
Maslowich3 years ago
6 0
None of the above.
c
c
c
c
c
You might be interested in
Which of the following best describes the Muslim view of Abraham, Moses, and Jesus?
gregori [183]
Prophets (just typing this because it needs to be 20 characters long)
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did indentured servitude decline? Select the best answer from the choices provided. Europe’s economy improved. Landowners wa
SashulF [63]
Europeans started to enslave Africans.  

They started to use slaves instead of indentured servants, because the investment was better.  Indentured servants only served for a few years, and then were granted freedom, while slaves were purchased and used for their entire lives.  The investment of a slave was better than an indentured servant. 
7 0
3 years ago
What impact did the oil industry have on transportation in the United States
Andreyy89

Answer:

North America is experiencing a boom in crude oil supply, primarily due to growing production in the Canadian oil sands and the recent expansion of shale oil production from the Bakken fields in North Dakota and Montana as well as the Eagle Ford and Permian Basins in Texas. Taken together, these new supplies are fundamentally changing the U.S. oil supply-demand balance. The United States now meets 66% of its crude oil demand from production in North America, displacing imports from overseas and positioning the United States to have excess oil and refined products supplies in some regions.

The rapid expansion of North American oil production has led to significant challenges in transporting crudes efficiently and safely to domestic markets—principally refineries—using the nation’s legacy pipeline infrastructure. In the face of continued uncertainty about the prospects for additional pipeline capacity, and as a quicker, more flexible alternative to new pipeline projects, North American crude oil producers are increasingly turning to rail as a means of transporting crude supplies to U.S. markets. Railroads are more willing to enter into shorter-term contracts with shippers than pipelines, offering more flexibility in a volatile oil market. According to rail industry officials, U.S. freight railroads delivered 435,560 carloads of crude oil in 2013 (roughly equivalent to 300 million barrels), compared to 9,500 carloads in 2008. In the first half of 2014, 258,541 carloads of crude oil were delivered. Crude imports by rail from Canada have increased more than 20-fold since 2011. The amount of oil transported by rail may also be influenced by a tight market for U.S.-built tankers. However, if recent oil price declines persist and the price falls below the level at which Bakken producers can cover their costs, some production could be shut in, potentially reducing the volume of oil carried by rail.

While oil by rail has demonstrated benefits with respect to the efficient movement of oil from producing regions to market hubs, it has also raised significant concerns about transportation safety and potential impacts to the environment. The most recent data available indicate that railroads consistently spill less crude oil per ton-mile transported than other modes of land transportation. Nonetheless, safety and environmental concerns have been underscored by a series of major accidents across North America involving crude oil transportation by rail—including a catastrophic fire that caused numerous fatalities and destroyed much of Lac Mégantic, Quebec, in 2013. Following that event, the U.S. Department of Transportation issued a safety alert warning that the type of crude oil being transported from the Bakken region may be more flammable than traditional heavy crude oil.

5 0
2 years ago
A direct result o the neolithic revolution is that people
anastassius [24]
A direct result of the neolithic revolution is that people began living in permanent settlements, meaning they weren't considered nomads anymore - they stayed and settled in one place.
6 0
3 years ago
Your friend asked for your help examining research documents you tell your friend it is necessary to determine the relevance and
shusha [124]
Assess the credablity of the source make sure it's not bias and has strong examples and stats. Use the Craap test.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Stamp Act outraged colonists because they believed that only Parliament could tax them. True False
    9·2 answers
  • What gains did the civil rights movement make by the early 1970s?
    6·1 answer
  • Read this excerpt from an amendment to the US Constitution.
    12·1 answer
  • How did World War I impact African Americans?
    13·2 answers
  • EASY QUESTION! I'LL GIVE YOU ALL MY POINTS. PLEASE HELP I WANT SLEEP.
    12·1 answer
  • What statement is true of a treaty​
    5·1 answer
  • What was the outcome of the Battle of Bull Run? What did this do to the Union moral and thoughts on the war?
    8·1 answer
  • Pls answer asap pls make the answer short and esay to under stand
    14·1 answer
  • 3. Which of the following best describes what is meant by the term "Old South"?
    9·1 answer
  • i really need this done by today and i’ve got this project to finish i need this quick (i’ll do the bubble map i only need the q
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!