1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Luden [163]
3 years ago
14

Which amendment forbids illegal search and seizure?

History
2 answers:
raketka [301]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures!

Leviafan [203]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A

Explanation:

the other guy said it

You might be interested in
Within months of his inauguration in January 2001, President George W. Bush announced that he wanted to begin building a missile
Leto [7]
Within months of his inauguration in January 2001, President George W. Bush announced that he wanted to begin building a missile defense shield for the United States because he was concerned about certain other nations obtaining nuclear missiles.  

on the other hand, the ABM was no longer in effect due to president's Bush announcement regarding the withdrawal of the United States from the ABM Treaty.
5 0
2 years ago
How was Judaism different than previous polytheistic belief systems?
AURORKA [14]
The main difference is that <span>Judaism is monotheistic, which means they were the first to believe there was only one god.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
In a least 150 words answer the following question. Which of the three economic systems (market, planned, and mixed) do you beli
sdas [7]
Scarcity is the fundamental challenge that all individuals and nations must confront. Everyone faces some limitations, so we all have to make choices where we limit or allow ourselves to something.

Economists generally recognize four types of economic systems traditional, traditional, command, market and mixed.

A traditional economic system is shaped by tradition. The work that people do, the goods and services they provide, how they exchange resources… all tend to follow a pattern. The traditional system is bad at addressing scarcity because scarcity is formed off of new requirements people have through the ages and a traditional system would not evolve just as our requirements would.

In a planned economy, the government controls the economy. The state decides how to use and distribute resources. The government regulates prices and wages; it may even determine what sorts of work individuals do.
Socialism is a prime example of a planned economy. Socialism does not work because it is not consistent with the fundamental principles of human behavior. The failure of socialism in countries around the world can be traced to one critical defect: it is a system that ignores incentives.

Market economies allow all economic decisions to be made by individuals. The unrestrained interactions between individuals and companies in the marketplace determine what happens to all the good and resources.Individuals choose how to invest their personal resources and individuals decide what to consume. Within a pure market economy,  the government is entirely absent from economic affairs.

A mixed economic system combines elements of the market and command economy. Many economic decisions are made in the market by individuals. But the government also plays a role in the allocation and distribution of resources.

If scarcity is looked at on a macro level, the best economic system is mixed because it allows the government to also plays a role in the allocation and distribution of resources, while the individuals still stay happy because they have some control. The only problem is the eternal question of what the right mix between the public and private sectors of the economy should be.

There is no point to look at it on a micro level because almost no country is small enough to be considered on that level.


6 0
3 years ago
According to this passage, a PRIMARY reason for creating The Articles of Confederation of the United Colonies of New England was
forsale [732]
Hey it’s c !!!!!!!!!
4 0
2 years ago
Define judicial activism and judicial restraint. Explain the reasons that judges would exercise
Gelneren [198K]

Answer:

Judicial restraint

Judicial restraint is a judicial interpretation that recommends favoring the status quo in judicial activities; it is the opposite of judicial activism. Aspects of judicial restraint include the principle of stare decisis; a conservative approach to standing and a reluctance to grant certiorari; and a tendency to deliver narrowly tailored verdicts, avoiding "unnecessary resolution of broad questions."

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Wheat farming in California depended on
    7·1 answer
  • Why was britain against american idependence write in a paragraph
    10·1 answer
  • Why were scribes important in sumerian society
    14·1 answer
  • what was one major problem caused by Europeans drawing new African borders during the Scramble for Africa?
    15·1 answer
  • What problem did William marburry have once president jefferson took office
    15·1 answer
  • Why was the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki so controversial
    5·2 answers
  • Which one of the following agencies is considered an independent federal agency?
    14·1 answer
  • President Johnson was often in conflict with the Radical Republicans because
    9·2 answers
  • Name three things that have slowed democracy in Africa?
    6·1 answer
  • Help please ASAP asap
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!