1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
oksano4ka [1.4K]
2 years ago
12

Any evidence uncovered in an investigation can be used in court.true or false

Law
1 answer:
Sedaia [141]2 years ago
3 0
The correct answer is true
You might be interested in
PLS HELP How does the Constitution limit democracy?
katovenus [111]

Answer:

All constitutional democracies use separation of powers as an important means of limiting the exercise of political power. This separation is typically among legislative, executive, and judicial functions. This was to keep any one power from gaining too much power.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
If you are deaf and communicate with sign language:
sveta [45]

Answer:

You may bring an interpreter with you to knowledge and/or road test

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
benefits of the people from the government in regards to formulation of welfare for social protection
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

Answer:

whats the question

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
_ is the force that causes the second and third collisions in an<br> automobile crash.
Andrew [12]

Answer:

Kinetic energy

Explanation:

kinetic energy will have to be dispersed in order cause the vehicle to come to a stop

3 0
3 years ago
What are the advantages and disadvantages of a separate system of justice for juveniles? Be sure to fully explain your reasons.
lapo4ka [179]

Answer:

Explanation:

Age is the most significant clear measure isolating the adolescent court from the grown-up criminal court. State laws shift in the base and greatest age limitations. Under precedent-based law, the base age for considering an individual responsible for criminal conduct is 7. Most extreme age is the age when an individual is characterized as a grown-up and not, at this point subject to the authority of adolescent court. Most states set the greatest age at 17 years old or underneath.

Police caution

Police practice gigantic prudence in managing adolescent guilty parties. They have the accompanying choices:

Discharge and caution.

Discharge and document a report.

Take the adolescent to the police headquarters and make a referral to a network youth‐services organization.

Allude to adolescent court consumption, without confinement.

Allude to adolescent court admission, with detainment.

More than 70 percent of the adolescents who are captured by the police are alluded to the court. Yet, numerous contacts between the police and adolescents are never recorded on the grounds that the police handle things casually. For offenses, for example, check in time infringement, fleeing, and intruding, the police may caution the adolescent as well as educate the guardians. Now and then police allude adolescents to social‐service offices, a training called redirection, which expels the adolescent from the adolescent equity framework and evades any negative results that may connect to naming a young "reprobate."

A police or school referral to adolescent court can be made with or without detainment. Confinement is the transitory imprisoning of young people who are anticipating demeanor of their cases. Most state laws require a confinement hearing under the steady gaze of an adolescent court judge can hear a case. The intention is to conclude whether to discharge the youngster to their folks or hold care. The significant purposes for securing up adolescents detainment focuses are

To make sure about their quality at court procedures.

To hold the individuals who can't be sent home in light of the fact that parental oversight is deficient.

To keep them from hurting themselves and to forestall wrongdoings (preventive confinement).

In 1994, more than 12,000 misconduct cases were moved to grown-up criminal court by a procedure called confirmation (waiver of ward). State and government resolutions indicate the time of youthful wrongdoers (typically 16 or 17) at which criminal courts have locale and accommodate waiver. The choice with respect to whether to move a case is made by an adolescent court judge at an exchange hearing.

In certain states, waivers can apply to adolescents over the age of 16 paying little mind to offense. In different states waivers can happen just for lawful offenses. The impact of a waiver is to deny an adolescent the security of the adolescent court and to expose the adolescent to the chance of getting cruel discipline. The Supreme Court governed in Stanford v. Kentucky (1989) that capital punishment can be forced for wrongdoings submitted by adolescents as youthful as 16.

Arbitration in adolescent court

During an arbitration (or fact‐finding) hearing, an adolescent court judge chooses whether or not there is verification past a sensible uncertainty to name a young "reprobate." Rights stood to adolescents incorporate

The option to notice of charges.

The option to advise.

The option to stand up to witnesses.

The privilege to cross‐examine witnesses.

The benefit against self‐incrimination.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following cannot be considered a benefit of implementing HACCP?
    6·2 answers
  • Do arresting officers ever obtain incriminating statements from suspects ?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following units of local government has home rule status under t<br>Constitution?​
    13·1 answer
  • What is the congressman a member of ?
    8·1 answer
  • A man was accused of attacking another man. He was brought into police custody and interrogated for 2 hours. Prior to the interr
    12·2 answers
  • A goal that is attainable for one person may be unattainable for another.<br> True<br> False
    9·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ! need for today<br><br><br>PLEASE EXPLAIN
    14·2 answers
  • Laws come from many places, including:
    10·1 answer
  • Consequences for breaking alcohol selling laws include�
    9·1 answer
  • Suppose that the president proposes a new law aimed at reducing healthcare costs. All americans are required to eat one apple da
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!