Answer:
small claims court handles cases involving property damage
Lord Farquad settles for a good nights rest
Answer:
Very less or often no space for creativeness or innovative inputs into the system.
Highly rigid decision making system. ...
There is a severe lack of empathy or rationality.
The origination is highly regulated by set rules and regulations.
Productivity and efficiency are achieved through standardization of processes
Answer: Woodson v North Carolina and Roberts v Lousianna
Explanation:
In Boykin v. Alabama (1969), the Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of the death penalty for the first time.
By 1972, Furman v. Georgia ruled a Georgia death penalty law was cruel and unusual punishment, which is forbidden by the Eighth Amendment. In 1976 there were five "Death Penalty Cases". While Gregg v. Georgia, Jurek v. Texas, and Proffitt v. Florida, confirmed the states´ death penalties, Woodson v. North Carolina and Roberts v. Louisiana overturned the mandatory death sentences.
Answer:
The term, “statute of limitations” refers to laws that limit that amount of time a person has to bring a lawsuit.
Explanation:
Like just about every other type of legal claim, medical malpractice claims are subject to lawsuit filing deadlines that are set by state law. This kind of law is known as a statute of limitations. The purpose of this article is to help you understand how a medical malpractice claim can be affected by the statute of limitations, and the importance of paying attention to the deadline as it applies to your case.
