Answer:
Since a defeasance clause conveys title upon satisfaction of the loan, these types of clauses are typically only used in title theory states where the bank holds ownership of the home until the mortgage is paid off.
Answer:
1 Line item description Cost Retail
2 Beginning inventory 40000 360000
3 Purchases 1000000 10000000
4 Transportation in 50000
5 Purchase returns -20000 -196000
6 Net purchases(3+4+5) 1030000 9804000
7 Net additional markups 800000
8 Cost to retail ratio 1070000 10964000
component(2+6+7)
9 Net markdowns -500000
10 Sales -9800000
11 Ending inventory,retail(8+9+10) 664000
Setup calculation:
Cost to retail ratio = Cost to retail ratio component at cost/Cost to retail ratio component at retail
= 1070000/10964000
= 0.097592
= 9.76%
Ending inventory,cost = Ending inventory,retail*Cost to retail ratio
= 664000*9.76%
= $64806
Cost of goods sold = Sales*Cost to retail ratio
= 9800000*9.76%
= $956480
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": Materiality.
Explanation:
The Materiality principle refers that one of the accounting standards can be left behind only if it has an irrelevant impact on the financial statements. According to the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) only when an item is "<em>immaterial</em>", provisions for the transaction derived from that item are not mandatory. But, the definition of what is material and immaterial is not provided by the GAAP, then, it relies on the judgment of the accountant.
Answer:
The correct answer is 3,175,300.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the computation of the given data are as follows:
We can calculate the number of shares by using following formula:
Number of shares = [ Outstanding + ( Additional share × Months) + ( Additional share × Months)] × 1+Dividend
By putting the value, we get
= [2,600,000 + (280,000 × 6/12) + (280,000 × 3/12)] × 1.13
= [ 2,600,000 + 140,000 + 70,000 ] × 1.13
= 3,175,300
Answer: No.
Explanation:
This is a Perfectly Competitive market and that means that you are a price taker who maximises output at a point where Marginal Revenue equals Marginal Cost ( MR = MC). As costs have gone up, it simply means that for the conditions to be satisfied, you need to produce less at the factory in Connecticut.
That does not mean that you have to produce more at the Massachusetts plant because it is already producing at capacity and increasing the marginal cost would violate the MR=MC rule as you have no control over the price so you cannot change Marginal Revenue. It is therefore better to keep the production level at the Massachusetts plant unchanged.
