Answer:
Casey's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of potatoes is 5 kg of steak.
Casey's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of steak is 0.2 kg of potatoes.
Rick's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of potatoes is 3 kg of steak.
Rick's opportunity cost of producing 1 kg of steak is 0.33 kg of potatoes.
Casey should produce steak while Rick should produce potatoes, since Rick has a comparative advantage in producing potatoes (lower opportunity cost) and Casey has a comparative advantage in producing steak.
As long as the price of steak per kilogram of potatoes is less than 5 kg of steak and more than 3 kg of steak, then both would win. In order for both of them to win is a similarly proportional way, the exchange price should be 4 kg of steak per kg of potatoes.
Answer:
The most probable result is that the court will declare the contract invalid and non-binding because the purchase price and important terms regarding the consideration involve are too vague and indefinite.
In order for a contract to be considered valid and binding, consideration must exist and the more precise the terms, the better. Consideration is something of value that both parties exchange. In this case it is a house vs. money, but the price is not specified.
Since Drea is facing an ethical dilemma and she wants to have the best option to her ethical dilemma, for the second step, she wouls have to: Identify feasible options. Option b.
<h3>What is an ethical dilemma?</h3>
In philosophy, ethical dilemmas—also known as ethical paradoxes or moral dilemmas—arise when an agent must choose between two competing moral obligations, none of which takes precedence. A definition that is similarly comparable describes ethical situations as ones where there is no right decision to be made.
An ethical problem, also known as a moral problem or ethical paradox, arises when a person must choose between two possibilities, none of which are wholly ethically acceptable.
An ethical conflict is an opposition between two morally righteous actions. A disagreement exists between two values or principles. The problem is that by choosing one correct action, you will invalidate the other right course because you would be acting both rightly and wrongly at the same moment.
Read more on ethical dilemma here: brainly.com/question/3838938
#SPJ1
Answer:
B. Consolidation
Explanation:
Consolidation (or amalgamation), in a bussines context, is <em>when different companies combine to form a larger organization in order to improve their efficiency, long-term cost savings and a concentration of market share.</em>
I hope you find this information useful and interesting! Good luck!
<u>Answer:</u>
less
<u>Explanation:</u>
The law of diminishing marginal utility states that, as consumption of a good or service increases, its marginal utility decreases.
